Whole-Food, Plant-Based Diet for Active Crohn's Disease

May 20, 2022 updated by: Amanda M. Johnson, Mayo Clinic

Assessing the Role of a Whole-Food, Plant-Based (WFPB) Diet in the Treatment of Active Crohn's Disease

The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of a whole-food, plant-based (WFPB) diet to produce symptomatic remission in Crohn's Disease patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The goal of this proposal is to evaluate the efficacy of a whole-food, plant-based (WFPB) diet in the treatment of active Crohn's Disease (CD). Epidemiologic studies suggest that environmental factors, including diet, likely play a role in the pathogenesis and disease course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Evidence also exists to support the idea that dietary practices, such as adherence to a plant-based as opposed to a more "western" diet, can significantly modify the microbiome composition and intestinal barrier function - both of which likely impact the disease course of IBD. The overall hypothesis is that adoption of a WFPB diet will reduce both symptoms and intestinal inflammation in CD patients, as well as increase microbial diversity. Patients will be randomized to receive education on and adopt either WFPB or FODMAP diet, which will be adhered to for a total of 12 weeks. Two primary outcomes which will be assessed are rates of clinical remission based on sCDAI and also reduction in intestinal inflammatory burden based on fecal calprotectin. Several secondary outcomes will also be reviewed to include assessment for alterations in the gut microbiome and intestinal permeability, rates of clinical response based on sCDAI, changes in systemic inflammation based on CRP, and adherence rates to the diet interventions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older.
  • Have the capacity for informed consent.
  • Subjects must carry a diagnosis of CD at time of enrollment; the CD diagnosis will be based on clinical impression and documentation of the treating physician.
  • Have active symptoms based on sCDAI score of > 175.
  • Have active inflammation documented by either: a fecal calprotectin of >150 µg/g; OR high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) >5 mg/L; OR evidence of active inflammation on CT (Computer Tomography) or MR (Magnetic Resonance) enterography, based on discretion of reviewing radiologist; OR documentation of active Crohn's disease on colonoscopy, defined as SES-CD (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease) score of 3 or greater.
  • Patients may continue their currently prescribed, stable doses of medical therapy during the study duration.
  • Ability to have no more than 2 drinks/day for men and 1 drink/day for women.
  • Ability and willingness to adhere to one of the study diets.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized patients.
  • Disease activity score sCDAI > 400
  • Already following plant-based diet, FODMAP diet, or other nutritional trials.
  • Have recent changes in medical therapy (no start or change in immunomodulator, natalizumab, or vedolizumab within 12 weeks; 5-ASA, anti-TNFα agent, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib within 8 weeks; or corticosteroids within 2 weeks of randomization).
  • Have an ostomy or ileoanal pouch.
  • Have known luminal stricture or stenosis that would preclude consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables.
  • Plans for GI surgery within six weeks of enrollment.
  • Pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or breastfeeding.
  • Have other conditions such as diabetes or celiac disease that may impact ability to follow study diet.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Whole-Food, Plant-Based Diet Group
Subjects with a known diagnosis of Crohn's disease will follow a whole-food, plant-based diet for a total of 12 weeks
Other: Whole-Food, Plant-Based Diet
This diet is focused on nutritional needs with natural, minimally-processed plant foods.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: FODMAP Diet
Subjects with a known diagnosis of Crohn's disease will follow a FODMAP diet for a total of 12 weeks
Other: FODMAP Diet
An elimination diet of fermentable, oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptomatic remission
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12
Assessed utilizing the short Crohn's Disease Activity Index (sCDAI)
Baseline, week 6, week 12
Change in intestinal inflammation
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12
Assessed by fecal calprotectin levels. Elevated baseline levels of fecal calprotectin will be defined as >150 µg
Baseline, week 6, week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the ability of WFPB diet to improve rates of symptomatic response based on sCDAI
Time Frame: Will be evaluated at Visit 3 (week 6) and Visit 4 (week 12) for comparison to baseline.
Clinical response will be assessed based on changes in sCDAI, with response defined as reduction in sCDAI ≥ 100 as compared to baseline.
Will be evaluated at Visit 3 (week 6) and Visit 4 (week 12) for comparison to baseline.
Measure the reduction of systemic inflammation based on hsCRP
Time Frame: Will obtain levels at Visit 3 (week 6) and Visit 4 (week 12), for comparison to baseline levels prior to dietary intervention.
Will be evaluated by comparing changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), with reduction in systemic inflammation defined as normalization in hs-CRP to <5 mg/L.
Will obtain levels at Visit 3 (week 6) and Visit 4 (week 12), for comparison to baseline levels prior to dietary intervention.
Assess rates of adherence to diet interventions
Time Frame: This will be administered at Visit 1 (to understand baseline), Visit 3 (week 6), and Visit 4 (week 12).
Will assess rates of adherence by utilizing Viocare food frequency questionnaire.
This will be administered at Visit 1 (to understand baseline), Visit 3 (week 6), and Visit 4 (week 12).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 20, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 21-000714

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings