Effect of Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on 3-year Survival After Colorectal Surgery for Cancer (RACCOR)
Effect of Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol on 3-year Survival After Colorectal Surgery for Cancer - a Retrospective Cohort of 1001 Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Grenoble, France
- Jean-Luc Faucheron
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aadult patients, who had undergone resection for colorectal cancer or a precancerous lesion and were cared for using the ERAS protocol or received conventional care (pre-ERAS).
- Informed patients
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients presenting or developing peritoneal cancer,
- Patients having resection for palliative reasons,
- Patients those under curatorship or tutelage
- Opposed patients
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
|
Multidisciplinary approach to perioperative care.
|
|
Conventional Recovery Strategy (pre-ERAS)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate the effect of the implementation of this protocol on 3-year overall survival.
Time Frame: 3 years
|
3-year overall survival rate
|
3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Jean-Luc FAUCHERON, CHU Grenoble Alpes
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Alfonsi P, Slim K, Chauvin M, Mariani P, Faucheron JL, Fletcher D; le groupe de travail de la Societe francaise d'anesthesie et reanimation (Sfar) et de la Societe francaise de chirurgie digestive (SFCD). [Guidelines for enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014 May;33(5):370-84. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 May 20. French.
- Gignoux B, Gosgnach M, Lanz T, Vulliez A, Blanchet MC, Frering V, Faucheron JL, Chasserant P. Short-term Outcomes of Ambulatory Colectomy for 157 Consecutive Patients. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):317-321. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002800.
- Faucheron JL, Trilling B, Sage PY. Ambulatory colectomy: fast-track management pushed to its limits? Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Oct;22(10):741-742. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1871-5. Epub 2018 Nov 9. No abstract available.
- Trilling B, Sage PY, Faucheron JL. What is fast track multimodal management of colorectal cancer surgery in real life? Tech Coloproctol. 2018 May;22(5):401-402. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1799-9. Epub 2018 Jun 1. No abstract available.
- Carrier G, Cotte E, Beyer-Berjot L, Faucheron JL, Joris J, Slim K; Groupe Francophone de Rehabilitation Amelioree apres Chirurgie (GRACE). Post-discharge follow-up using text messaging within an enhanced recovery program after colorectal surgery. J Visc Surg. 2016 Aug;153(4):249-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
- Slim K, Delaunay L, Joris J, Leonard D, Raspado O, Chambrier C, Ostermann S; Le Groupe francophone de rehabilitation amelioree apres chirurgie (GRACE). How to implement an enhanced recovery program? Proposals from the Francophone Group for enhanced recovery after surgery (GRACE). J Visc Surg. 2016 Dec;153(6S):S45-S49. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 14. No abstract available.
- Faujour V, Slim K, Corond P. [The future, in France, of enhanced recovery after surgery seen from the economical perspective]. Presse Med. 2015 Jan;44(1):e23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Dec 22. French.
- Launay-Savary MV, Mathonnet M, Theissen A, Ostermann S, Raynaud-Simon A, Slim K; GRACE (Groupe francophone de Rehabilitation Amelioree apres Chirurgie). Are enhanced recovery programs in colorectal surgery feasible and useful in the elderly? A systematic review of the literature. J Visc Surg. 2017 Feb;154(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.