Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) Combined With Allograft in Treatment of Calcaneus Fractures (BMAC)

July 27, 2023 updated by: Michael Johnson, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Randomized Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Combined With Cryopreserve Allograft Bone in the Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BMAC when used in conjunction with viable allograft bone for treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, in terms of rate of allograft incorporation into the host tissue, bone healing, and functional outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study group will consist of patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures admitted to our academic level I trauma center that underwent open reduction internal fixation. Inclusion criteria will be patients with a closed displaced intra-articular fracture Sanders type III without any evidence of neurovascular injury. Patients will be randomly divided into three groups according to the plan of management: autograft alone, viable allograft combined with BMAC, or viable allograft alone. Radiographic imaging and three-dimensional standing computed tomography will be used to assess the articular surface, Bohler's angle, the crucial angle of Gissane, and the height, width and length of the calcaneus. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind-foot scoring system and visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to post-operative evaluation of the patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Closed displaced intra-articular fracture without any evidence of nerve or blood vessel injury, the fractures belonged to Sanders type III according to Sanders classification and amenable to open reduction internal fixation
  • Life expectancy of at least 1 year
  • Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and able to comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen
  • Adequate soft tissue coverage at the fracture site through primary closure.
  • Unilateral or bilateral calcaneal fractures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women or planning on becoming pregnant during the investigational period
  • Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c levels > 10%)
  • A current endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis
  • Currently has untreated malignant neoplasm(s), or is currently undergoing radiation therapy or chemotherapy.
  • Inadequate neurovascular status in the involved limb that may jeopardize healing.
  • Patients who have a preexisting calcaneus deformity that cannot accommodate a reduction or a previous history of osteomyelitis in the index limb.
  • Other ipsilateral lower extremity fracture(s) if, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such fracture(s) will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Autograft
Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group an autograft will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of autologous grafting, cancellous strips of bone will be harvested from the posterior superior iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). This will be the control arm.
Device: Autograft
An autograft bone will be harvested from proximal tibia or posterior superior iliac crest. First the bony landmarks of the posterior iliac crest or proximal tibia are palpated. The skin is then injected down to and including the periosteum with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. After 1 cm skin incision and gentle dissection of subcutaneous soft tissue, the bone harvesting device inserted through the skin and subcutaneous tissues until it reaches the cortical bone. Then, manual pressure is used to position the bone harvesting device against the dense cortical bone. A battery-powered power instrument is then will be used to drill the harvesting device into the medullary cavity. After the harvesting device insertion the cancellous strips of bone will be harvested and applied to the fracture site gap.At the conclusion of autograft bone harvesting procedure, the wound will be closed with 3-0 Nylon and a sterile dressing will be applied to the harvest site.
Other: Allograft only
Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) will be used to fill the void. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s).
Device: Allograft only
The jar containing allograft tissue and cryopreservation solution will be placed in a sterile basin containing a warm (35°C to 39°C; 95°F to 102.2°F) sterile irrigant (Normal saline or 5% Dextrose in Lactated Ringer's Solution). The jar containing the allograft will remain in this solution until the contents of the jar flows freely upon inversion. The jar will be removed from the warm solution once free-flowing. Sterile gauze or the optional strainer will be used to decant the cryopreservation solution into a waste container. 5% Dextrose in Lactated Ringer's Solution will be added to the indicated fill line to immerse the allograft tissue. The cap will be replaced and inverted twice to suspend tissue until ready for use. 5% Dextrose will be decanted in Lactated Ringer's Solution prior to use. Implant will be used within 2 hours of thawing.
Other: Allograft combined with BMAC
Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) combined with BMAC will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of BMAC preparation, bone marrow will be collected from iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s).
Device: Allograft combined with BMAC
A bone marrow aspiration kit will be used for bone marrow aspiration. First the bony landmarks of the posterior iliac crest and sacroiliac joint are palpated. The skin is then injected down to and including the periosteum with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. Then, the bone marrow aspiration trochar and needle are percutaneously inserted through the skin and subcutaneous tis- sues until it reaches the posterior iliac crest. The trajectory of the needle will be parallel to the iliac crest, or perpendicular to the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) or Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS), depending on the harvest site used. After the trochar is inserted into the posterior iliac crest but prior to aspiration, 1 mL of heparin (1,000 U/mL) will be preloaded into the syringe. Approximately 60 mL of bone marrow will be aspirated, which requires the use of two 30-mL syringes. At the conclusion of BMAC harvesting, a sterile dressing will be applied to the harvest site.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
baseline to 6 weeks
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
Time Frame: baseline to 12 weeks
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
baseline to 12 weeks
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
Time Frame: baseline to 24 weeks
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
baseline to 24 weeks
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
Time Frame: baseline to 52 weeks
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
baseline to 52 weeks
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
baseline to 6 weeks
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline to 12 weeks
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
baseline to 12 weeks
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline to 24 weeks
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
baseline to 24 weeks
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline to 52 weeks
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
baseline to 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Johnson, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 27, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB-300003034

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings