The Comparative Clinical Performance of Two Daily Disposable Toric Contact Lenses
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Heckmondwike, United Kingdom, WF16 0EZ
- Phipps Opticians
-
-
Edinburg
-
Edinburgh, Edinburg, United Kingdom, EH3 6SW
- Cameron Optometry
-
-
Leeds
-
Oakwood, Leeds, United Kingdom, LS8 2HU
- Simon Falk Eyecare
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- They are at least 18 years old and have the capacity to volunteer.
- They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
- They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
- They currently wear soft contact lenses or have done so in the past two years.
- They have a spherical component of their contact lens prescription between Plano to - 6.00DS (inclusive).
- They have a cylindrical component of their contact lens prescription between -0.75DC and -2.50DC (inclusive).
- They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study lens types.
- At dispensing, they could attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses within the available power range.
- They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least eight hours per day).
- They own a wearable pair of spectacles.
- They agree not to participate in other clinical research while enrolled on this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
- They have a systemic disorder, which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
- They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
- They are aphakic.
- They have had corneal refractive surgery.
- They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
- They are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
- They have eye or health conditions including immunosuppressive or infectious diseases, which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
- They are currently wearing one of the study contact lenses.
- They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Lens A, then Lens B
Participants wore Lens A for one week, then crossed over to wear Lens B for one week.
|
Daily disposable for one week
Daily disposable for one week
|
|
Experimental: Lens B, then Lens A
Participants wore Lens B for one week, then crossed over to wear Lens A for one week.
|
Daily disposable for one week
Daily disposable for one week
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Handling Rating on Lens Removal
Time Frame: One week
|
Subjective handling rating on lens removal was measured on a scale of 0-100 where 0=Unmanageable and 100=Excellent removal.
|
One week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Lens Fit at Follow-up
Time Frame: One Week
|
Lens fit was reported as either optimum, acceptable, or unacceptable.
To determine this, lens fit parameters (horizontal centration, vertical centration, corneal coverage, and lens movement) were measured on a 5-point scale (-2 to +2), where -2=Extremely nasal, 0=Optimum, and +2=Extremely temporal.
Scores between -1 and +1 were considered "Acceptable".
For overall lens fit to be 'acceptable', no parameters could be extreme.
For a score to be 'optimum', all parameters needed to be optimum.
|
One Week
|
|
Biomicroscopy Score at Follow-up
Time Frame: One week
|
Slit lamp biomicroscopy was used to assign grades to various biomicroscopic signs, as assessed by investigator, using Efron Grading Scales scored to the nearest 0.1 unit.
Grading ranged from 0-4, where 0=None and 4=Severe.
|
One week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Philip Morgan, Eurolens Research
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- C20-691 (EX-MKTG-121)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.