Effects of Core Stabilization Training With and Without Pressure Biofeedback in Patients With Low Back Pain
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
- Riphah International University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:\
- Male and female patients between the age group 25-40 years having mechanical low back pain persisting for at least 6 months upto1 year.
- Patients complaining Pain when sitting or standing for a long period or Pain when driving long distance, getting in and out of the car or lifting activities.
- Patients with minimum and moderate disability based on Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
- Patients with greater than and equal to 7 score on NPRS.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Structural deformity (scoliosis, lordosis).
- Systematic inflammatory disease (vasculitis, connective tissue disease and granulomatous disease).
- Nerve root compression (Disc bulge and Lumbar radiculopathy).
- History of spinal surgery or fractures (laminectomy).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A
: Core stabilization training with pressure biofeedback unit
|
: Core stabilization training with pressure biofeedback unit
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B
: Core stabilization training without pressure biofeedback unit
|
: Core stabilization training without pressure biofeedback unit
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
NPRS
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
In a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10, 0 and 20 or 0 and 100 that fits best to their pain intensity [1].
Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst pain ever possible
|
4 weeks
|
|
oswestry disability index
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability.
The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage.
Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Muhammad Salman Bashir, PhD, Riphah International University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Burton AK, Balague F, Cardon G, Eriksen HR, Henrotin Y, Lahad A, Leclerc A, Muller G, van der Beek AJ; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Prevention in Low Back Pain. Chapter 2. European guidelines for prevention in low back pain : November 2004. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S136-68. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1070-3. No abstract available.
- Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983 May;16(1):87-101. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X.
- Bhadauria EA, Gurudut P. Comparative effectiveness of lumbar stabilization, dynamic strengthening, and Pilates on chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Aug 29;13(4):477-485. doi: 10.12965/jer.1734972.486. eCollection 2017 Aug.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- REC/Lhr/21/0117 Hashim
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.