Promoting INformed Approaches in Precision Oncology and ImmuNoTherapy (PINPOINT)
Reducing Racial Disparities in Cancer Care With PINPOINT (Promoting INformed Approaches in Precision Oncology and ImmuNoTherapy)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Rebecca Ayala, BS
- Phone Number: 732-258-6982
- Email: raa191@cinj.rutgers.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
- The Rutgers Cancer Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria
Patient Key Informant:
- Age 18 and older
- Self-identify as Black/African American
- Diagnosed with solid tumor
- Able to read and speak English fluently
- Able to provide informed consent
- Able to complete 1 survey and an in-depth interview
Relative Key Informant:
- Age 18 and older
- Spouse, blood relative, or caregiver of a cancer patient who identifies as Black/African American
- Able to read and speak English fluently
- Able to provide informed consent
- Able to complete 1 survey and an in-depth interview
Provider Key Informant:
- Age 18 and older
- Physician, nurse, social worker, patient navigator, or financial counselor
- Work in oncology setting
- Able to read and speak English fluently
- Able to provide informed consent
- Able to complete 1 survey and an in-depth interview
Pilot Tester:
- Age 18 and older
- Self-identify as Black/African American
- Able to read and speak English fluently
- Able to provide informed consent
- Newly diagnosed with solid tumor cancer (Stage I-IV)
- Have not yet consulted with an oncologist regarding treatment
- Able to complete 2 surveys and an in-depth interview
Exclusion Criteria
Key informants will be excluded from the study if they do not meet the inclusion criteria. Pilot testers will be excluded from the study if they previously participated as key informants and do not meet inclusion criteria.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PINPOINT Digital Educational Tool
Newly diagnosed Black cancer patients will be asked to access and engage with the educational website/intervention prototype before their clinic visit or in the clinic immediately before their appointment with their treating oncologist.
|
The intervention prototype called the PINPOINT Digital Educational Tool will be comprised of four main sections that include information about: 1) precision oncology; 2) clinical trials; 3) "Learn More" screens; and 4) discussion points and questions for the treating clinician.
The intervention prototype will also include a search function, short videos of patient testimonials, patient-provider interaction about immunotherapy and clinical trials, as well as a list of questions/concerns that the patient could print (or save electronically) and take with them to their provider visit.
An optional chatbot will be available in the corner of the screen.
Users can ask the chatbot questions about any of the material on the website or request additional information.
The chatbot will also be able to help patients search for molecularly targeted and immunotherapy clinical trials and offer additional resources (such as websites and online support groups).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Intervention
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of the PINPOINT intervention during the pilot testing session (same day; intervention and exit survey completed within approximately 30-40 minutes total).
|
Measured using the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM).
Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Cronbach's α = .85.
|
Immediately following completion of the PINPOINT intervention during the pilot testing session (same day; intervention and exit survey completed within approximately 30-40 minutes total).
|
|
Appropriateness of Intervention
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of the PINPOINT intervention during the pilot testing session (same day; intervention and exit survey completed within approximately 30-40 minutes total).
|
Measured using the 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM).
Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness.
Cronbach's α = .91.
|
Immediately following completion of the PINPOINT intervention during the pilot testing session (same day; intervention and exit survey completed within approximately 30-40 minutes total).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge About Precision Oncology
Time Frame: Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
Assessed using two researcher-developed items based on the intervention content.
Scores ranged from 0 to 2, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
|
Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
|
Knowledge About Clinical Trials
Time Frame: Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
Assessed using 4 researcher-developed items based on the intervention content.
Scores ranged from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
|
Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
|
Decision Self-efficacy for Tumor Genomic Sequencing.
Time Frame: Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
Assessed using the 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale.
Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in participants' ability to make informed decisions about tumor genomic sequencing.
|
Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
|
Decision Self-efficacy for Targeted/Immune Therapy
Time Frame: Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
Assessed using the 11-item Decision Self Efficacy Scale.
Scored ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scored indicating greater confidence in participants' ability to make informed decisions about receiving targeted or immune therapies.
|
Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
|
Patient Empowerment
Time Frame: Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
Assessed using the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM).
Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater levels of patient activation and empowerment in managing one's health and health care.
|
Baseline assessed before exposure to the PINPOINT intervention; follow-up assessed by survey within approximately 1 week after the participant's oncology consultation.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anita Y Kinney, PhD, RN, Rutgers Cancer Institute
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 132101
- Pro2021000072 (Other Identifier: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.