Randomized Trial of Immediate Endoscopic Necrosectomy vs. Step-up Endoscopic Interventions in Necrotizing Pancreatitis (DESTIN)

July 28, 2023 updated by: Orlando Health, Inc.

Randomized Trial Comparing Immediate Endoscopic Necrosectomy vs. Step-up Endoscopic Interventions in Necrotizing Pancreatitis

This is a randomized trial comparing immediate endoscopic necrosectomy vs. step-up endoscopic interventions in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, there has been a recent shift away from surgical debridement (surgical necrosectomy) towards minimally invasive endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic management involves the creation of a fistula (tract) between the gastric or duodenal wall and the necrotic collection, under the guidance of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with subsequent placement of a stent. In addition, performing endoscopic necrosectomy, which involves extraction of necrotic material under direct endoscopic visualization has increased rates of treatment success to greater than 80%.

However to date, there are currently scant data on the optimal timing of endoscopic necrosectomy. The aim of this randomized trial is therefore to compare the clinical outcomes between patients undergoing immediate endoscopic necrosectomy compared to step-up endoscopic interventions in patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for necrotizing pancreatitis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Orlando Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or over
  2. Symptomatic necrotic collection (that is suspected or confirmed to be infected), diagnosed on MRI or CT abdomen/pelvis (seen as a fluid collection in the setting of documented pancreatic necrosis that contains necrotic material and encased within a partial or complete wall)
  3. Necrotic collection of any size with extent to necrosis of ≥ 33% and any number of loculations, located within the pancreatic/peri-pancreatic space
  4. Necrotic collection visualized on EUS and amenable to EUS-guided drainage

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 18 years
  2. Females who are pregnant
  3. Necrotic collection that is not amenable for EUS-guided drainage
  4. Irreversible coagulopathy (defined as INR >1.5, thrombocytopenia with platelet count < 50,000/mL)
  5. Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued for the procedure
  6. Unable to obtain consent for the procedure from either the patient or LAR

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Immediate endoscopic necrosectomy
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of the necrotic collection is performed using a lumen-apposing metal stent. Then in this group, endoscopic necrosectomy will be performed immediately following index EUS-guided drainage of the necrotic collection, during the same session
Procedure: Immediate endoscopic necrosectomy
In the immediate endoscopic necrosectomy group, endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of the necrotic collection is performed using a lumen-apposing metal stent, immediately followed by endoscopic necrosectomy. Endoscopic necrosectomy involves removal of infected necrotic pancreatic tissue via the cystogastrostomy/cystoenterostomy tract using a variety of endoscopic accessories.
Active Comparator: Step-up endoscopic intervention
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of the necrotic collection is performed using a lumen-apposing metal stent. In this group, only EUS-guided drainage of the necrotic collection will be performed, and endoscopic necrosectomy will be performed at a separate session at a later time as needed.
Procedure: Step-up endoscopic interventions
In the step-up endoscopic interventions group, endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of the necrotic collection is performed using a lumen-apposing metal stent. Endoscopic necrosectomy is not performed during the index drainage session, but is performed at a later time as needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of reinterventions required for treatment success
Time Frame: 6 months
Treatment success is defined as the resolution of necrotic collection on CT scan in association with clinical resolution of symptoms at 6-month follow-up (6 months from index intervention)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of treatment success
Time Frame: 6 months
Treatment success is defined as the resolution of necrotic collection on CT scan in association with clinical resolution of symptoms at 6-month follow-up (6 months from index intervention)
6 months
Rate of resolution of pre-intervention systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
Time Frame: 72 hours
Assessment of presence or absence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome prior to and 72 hours post intervention
72 hours
Rate of resolution of at least 1 pre-intervention organ failure at 72 hours post index intervention
Time Frame: 72 hours
Assessment of presence or absence of organ failure prior to and post intervention
72 hours
Total number of readmissions due to disease-related symptoms or procedure-related events
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessment of readmissions due to disease-related or procedure-related events
6 months
Rate of technical success for EUS-guided cystogastrostomy
Time Frame: 24 hours
Technical success for EUS-guided cystogastrostomy is defined as the successful placement of the cystogastrostomy stent within the necrotic collection
24 hours
Rate of technical success for endoscopic necrosectomy
Time Frame: 24 hours
Technical success for endoscopic necrosectomy is defined as completion of endoscopic necrosectomy session as planned without the occurrence of adverse events
24 hours
Rate of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency
Time Frame: 6 months
Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is defined as fecal elastase level < 200μg/g in patients not previously taking pancreatic enzyme supplements
6 months
Rate of new onset diabetes
Time Frame: 6 months
New onset diabetes is defined as new onset elevation in fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, 2-hour plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL after an oral glucose tolerance test or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%
6 months
Rate of procedure-related adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
Procedure-related adverse events is defined as any adverse event occurring as a result of any endoscopic intervention
6 months
Rate of disease-related adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
Disease-related adverse events is defined as any adverse event occurring as a result of necrotizing pancreatitis
6 months
Post-procedure length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay
Time Frame: 6 months
Post-procedure length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay is defined as the number of days of patient's admission to the ICU following index intervention
6 months
Total length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 6 months
Total length of hospital stay is defined as the number of days of patient's admission in the hospital following index intervention
6 months
Overall treatment costs measured in US dollars
Time Frame: 6 months
Overall treatment costs include all relevant costs pertaining to treatment such as procedure costs, inpatient hospital stay costs, medication costs, materials costs, anesthesia costs, pharmacy costs and imaging studies costs.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Orlando Health, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Mayo Clinic
University of Alabama at Birmingham
University of Southern California
West Virginia University
Rush University
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Marshall University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ji Young Bang, MD MPH, Orlando Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 21.067.05
  • 1746067 (Other Identifier: Orlando Health IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings