Virtual and Video Counseling Versus In-Office Counseling for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Virtual and Video Counseling Versus In-Office Counseling for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: George K Thomas, MD
- Phone Number: 757-817-0353
- Email: thomasg6@ccf.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Katrin Arnolds, MD
- Phone Number: 305-389-6658
- Email: arnoldk@ccf.org
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Weston, Florida, United States, 33331
- Cleveland Clinic Florida
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic etiologies.
- Age of 20 years or older
- Understand English language (written and spoken) without difficulty
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age less than 20 years old
- Diagnosis of malignancy
- No access to technology that would allow for watching counseling video and/or completion of virtual visit
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: In-Office Visit Group
This control group will undergo standard in-office pre-operative counseling visit.
|
|
|
Experimental: Virtual Visit Group
This study group will receive pre-operative counseling via video, created by the Department of Gynecology at Cleveland Clinic Florida, followed by a virtual visit with a gynecologic surgery provider.
|
Intervention will be a pre-operative counseling video followed by a virtual visit with a gynecologic surgery provider, using standard and secure communications.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Differences in patient preparedness
Time Frame: Up to time of surgery
|
Assess differences in patient preparedness at the time of the surgery between patients who received video and virtual pre-operative counseling versus those who received in-person counseling.
|
Up to time of surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Unplanned office or emergency department visit
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after surgery
|
Observe how many patients from each cohort require an unplanned visit to the office or visit to the emergency department.
|
Up to 6 weeks after surgery
|
|
Same-day discharge versus admission rates
Time Frame: Up to 1 day after surgery
|
Note differences in same-day discharges or admission rates following surgery between each cohort
|
Up to 1 day after surgery
|
|
Readmission rates
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks after surgery
|
Record differences in readmission rates in the 6 week post-operative period between each cohort.
|
Up to 6 weeks after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Katrin Arnolds, MD, Cleveland Clinic Florida Gynecology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kenton K, Pham T, Mueller E, Brubaker L. Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):654.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.059.
- Krantz TE, Rogers RG, Petersen TR, Dunivan GC, White AB, Madsen AM, Jeppson PC, Ninivaggio CS, Cichowski SB, Komesu YM. Peer-Centered Versus Standard Physician-Centered Video Counseling for Midurethral Sling Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;26(8):470-476. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000784.
- Greene KA, Wyman AM, Scott LA, Hart S, Hoyte L, Bassaly R. Evaluation of patient preparedness for surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):179.e1-179.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
- Fountain CR, Havrilesky LJ. Promoting Same-Day Discharge for Gynecologic Oncology Patients in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;24(6):932-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 10.
- Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Rickey L, Dyer KY, Markland AD, Sirls L, Norton P, Casiano E, Paraiso MF, Ghetti C, Rahn DD, Kusek JW. Surgical preparation: are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jan;25(1):41-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FLA 21-022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.