Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Versus Partial Extraction Therapy
Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Versus Partial Extraction Therapy (PET) for Treating Fresh Extraction Sites With Thin Labial Plate of Bone With Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The current randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the VST versus Partial Extraction Therapy (PET) for immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone in class I fresh extraction sites.
The primary outcome was the assessment of vertical dimensional changes in peri-implant soft tissue margin.
The secondary outcome was the assessment of radiographic changes in the thickness of the facial peri-implant tissues.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt
- Private Practice Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- single hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone
- non-smokers
- systemically healthy
- Class I extraction sites
Exclusion Criteria:
- smoking
- Class II and III extraction sites
- hopeless teeth with acute infection or vertical/horizontal root fracture
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: VST technique
|
Procedure: Class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Vestibular Socket Therapy
A 1-cm-long vestibular access incision was made using a 15c blade 3 to 4 mm apical to the mucogingival junction at the related socket.
A subperiosteal tunnel was created connecting the socket orifice and the vestibular access incision
|
|
Active Comparator: PET technique
|
the hopeless tooth was decoronated 1 mm coronal to the gingival margin using a diamond bur.
Then, the facial root segment was separated from the rest of the root using a Lindemann bur in gentle mesiodistal sweeping strokes from the gingival margin to the apex of the root, aiming to separate the palatal and the labial root segments.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the peri-implant facial tissue thickness
Time Frame: at baseline and 6 months
|
through CBCT images (Carestream 8000D- Carestream Dental) that were taken at baseline and 6 months postoperatively
|
at baseline and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- VST_PET_20
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.