Optimization of Hip-exoskeleton Weight Attributes
Evaluating Optimal Weight Design Parameters of a Hip Exoskeleton Designed for Rehabilitation.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: James S Sulzer, PhD
- Phone Number: 15125419036
- Email: james.sulzer@utexas.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
- University of Texas at Austin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willing to commit to the full experimental session
Exclusion Criteria:
Functionally relevant lower limb musculoskeletal injury
- Functionally relevant osteoarthritis and weight bearing restrictions
- Severe respiratory problems that restrict the wearer from using a metabolic rate apparatus
- Patients with cardiac issues may be included, but the cardiac issue will be noted in the health history questionnaire
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Weight distribution and placement
Changing where weight is distributed on belt around pelvis, specifically, bilaterally, 4th lumbar area, unilaterally on the left side.
Also changing amount of weight at 0, 4, 6 and 8 kg.
|
Wearing belt around waist with various weights attached.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pelvic Obliquity
Time Frame: One day
|
Amount of pelvic obliquity in response to weighted belt measured using optical motion capture
|
One day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Flexion Angle During Swing Phase
Time Frame: One Day
|
Knee flexion angle range of motion measured using optical motion capture
|
One Day
|
|
Integrated Gastrocnemius Muscle Activity During Preswing Phase of Walking
Time Frame: One day
|
EMG signals were normalized via the mean-dynamic method (Burden and Bartlett, 1999), centering the EMG signal around 1. For data analysis, the EMG signal was integrated along each gait phase to calculate the integrated EMG (iEMG) values.
For the gastrocnemius, we extrated the iEMG during the pre-swing phase only.
The iEMG was normalized to average during walking, resulting in arbitrary units.
|
One day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00001245
- R01HD100416 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.