Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT) (PILOT)

January 14, 2025 updated by: Kelly Barth, Medical University of South Carolina

NIDA CTN-0107 Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT)

The purpose of the Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT) study is to improve outcomes for individuals after surviving an overdose involving opioids. This study will be comparing the enhanced peer intervention known as PILOT for overdose survivors with treatment as usual (TAU) provided in the Emergency Department.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Carrie Papa, MBA
  • Phone Number: 843-876-1507
  • Email: papa@musc.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Youngstown, Ohio, United States, 44501
        • Mercy Health Youngstown
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
        • Prisma Health Upstate
    • Washington
      • Everett, Washington, United States, 98201
        • Providence Regional Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

To be included in this study participants must:

  1. Be 18 years of age or older at time of first contact by research staff (no upper age limit for inclusion).

  2. Meet one of the following non-fatal overdose involving opioids (NFOO) criteria:

    1. Having presented to the Emergency Department for any health issue within the past 48 hours AND self-report having a known or suspected overdose involving opioids in the past 72 hours, OR
    2. Having presented to the Emergency Department within the past 48 hours for any SUD-related health issue, self-report having a known or suspected overdose involving opioids in the past 30 days
  3. Be able to provide sufficient locator information, defined as identifying at least two individual contacts other than the participant.
  4. Be able to speak English sufficiently to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study as determined by research staff.
  5. Be willing and able to confirm future SUD treatment receipt as evidenced by 2 out of 3 of the following: (a) signing appropriate releases to for study staff to confirm treatment with follow-up provider; (b) having technology necessary to visualize medication bottles and transmit to study team utilizing HIPAA-compliant platform; and/or (c) able and willing to undergo toxicology tests (in person or via HIPAA-compliant videoconferencing).

Exclusion criteria include those who are:

  1. Identified as having had an intentional overdose as the Index NFOO.
  2. Actively suicidal at the time of screening (defined as current intention and/or plan for suicide attempt).
  3. Unable to complete study baseline procedures due to medical or psychiatric condition.
  4. Currently in jail, prison or in police custody at the time of the index ED visit or under current terms of civil commitment or guardianship (i.e., OHRP-defined prisoner status).
  5. Previously randomized as a participant in this study - individuals may only be enrolled and randomized once.
  6. Unwilling to follow study procedures (e.g., unable to provide sufficient locator information [defined as two contacts] or unavailable for follow-up assessments).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT) Peer
Behavioral: Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT) Peer
Participants will meet with the PILOT Peer consistently throughout the 6 months of study participation.
Behavioral: Treatment As Usual Peer
Participants will receive recovery resources and standard of care procedures specific to the Emergency Department.
Active Comparator: Treatment As Usual Peer
Behavioral: Treatment As Usual Peer
Participants will receive recovery resources and standard of care procedures specific to the Emergency Department.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Self-reported Overdose Risk Behaviors at 180 Days (6 Months) After Index ED Admission
Time Frame: 180 days (6 months)
Past month total score on the modified Overdose Risk Behavior Checklist (OBRC) at 180 days (6 months post-randomization) compared between experimental groups. The ORBC was a 13-item scale with 11 of the items used to generate a total score (ranging from 0-44); higher scores indicate greater frequency and number of overdose risk behaviors.
180 days (6 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Steps Achieved Along a Modified SUD Cascade of Care
Time Frame: 180 days (6 months)
Number of steps achieved along a modified substance use disorder (SUD) Cascade of Care (0-11 steps possible) at 180 days post-randomization (6 months). Higher scores are associated with better outcomes.
180 days (6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of South Carolina

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
The Emmes Company, LLC
National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kelly Barth, DO, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 28, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 8, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 00103441
  • 3UG1DA013727-20S5 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This study will comply with the NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm) and the HEAL Public Access and Data Sharing Policy (https://www.nih.gov/research-training/medical-research-initiatives/heal-initiative/research/heal-public-access-data-sharing-policy).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings