Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction
Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction in Maxillary Protrusion Cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- Future University in Egypt
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults and Adolescent patients (both genders)
- Age range (16-24)
- Patients with maxillary protrusion requiring first premolars extraction (Bimaxillary Protrusion or Class II division 1 cases).
- Patients with fully erupted permanent teeth (not necessarily including the third molar).
- Cases requiring maximum anchorage during retraction.
- Good general and oral health
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients suffering from any neural disorders or systemic diseases interfering with tooth movement.
- Patients with soft tissue problems such as cleft-palate patients
- Patients with extracted or missing permanent teeth. (except for third molars).
- Patients with badly decayed teeth.
- Patients with any parafunctional habits (i.e. Bruxism, tongue thrusting, mouth breathing, etc....).
- Patients with previous orthodontic treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: En-Masse Retraction
Six anterior teeth (en-Masse) retracted using a crimpable hook distal to the upper lateral incisor and a power chain
|
Power chain and Crimpable hook for En-Masse Retraction Retraction will start on a 0.017"x0.025"
Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 200 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the miniscrew
|
|
Experimental: two step retraction
Six anterior teeth are retracted by two step technique by canine retraction followed by four anterior teeth retraction using a crimpable hook distal to the upper lateral incisor and a power chain
|
Retraction of canine started on a 0.017"x0.025"
Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 150 g per side)followed by anterior teeth retraction on 0.017"x0.025"
Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 160 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the mini-screw.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mini-esthetics including
Time Frame: From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)]
|
Evaluation of (maxillary gingival display, Smile arc, buccal corridor) from social smile photograph Evaluation of (inter-labial gap) from At Rest photograph All primary outcome characteristics will be measured before and after retraction (measured Linear/ horizontal/ vertical in millimeters) by Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 software.
|
From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)]
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Macro-esthetics evaluation of profile photograph including
Time Frame: upto 6 months from the start of orthodontic treatment.
|
1. Nasolabial angle.
2. Mentolabial angle.
3. Incisors Inclination (Angular measurement in degrees).
4. Upper lip protrusion/ E- plane. 5. Lower lip protrusion/ E- plane.
(Linear measurement in millimeters.)
Cephalometric radiographs and Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 software
|
upto 6 months from the start of orthodontic treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Yehya mostafa, Professor and chairman, Future University in Egypt
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FUE.REC(26)/12-2019
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.