Trigger Point Injections Versus Lidocaine Patch for Myofascial Pain in the Emergency Department
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Trigger Point Injections With 1% Lidocaine Versus 5% Lidocaine Patch for Myofascial Pain in the Emergency Department
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Jonathan B Lee, MD
- Phone Number: 9098963192
- Email: jonbryanlee@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Bharath Chakravarthy, MD
- Email: bchakrav@uci.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Orange, California, United States, 92868
- Emergency Room at UCI Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- Diagnosed with myofascial pain of the posterior neck or back. *The diagnosis of myofascial pain was based on established criteria of having a palpable taut band (trigger point) that when depressed reproduced the patient's pain.
Exclusion Criteria:
- midline spinal tenderness
- evidence of radiculopathy
- pregnant
- have an allergy to lidocaine
- altered or deemed incapable of making informed consent
- had signs of infection or skin breakdown over the trigger point.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Trigger point with 1% Lidocaine
The physician will withdraw 1cc of 1% lidocaine in a 25g needle, sterilely prep the field with a Chloraprep applicator, use index, and middle finger to squeeze the borders of the trigger point and raise the central aspect of the trigger point, insert the needle at 90-degree angle up to 5/8' deep, inject 1cc of the 1% lidocaine after ensuring needle is not in a blood vessel, removing the needle, and then covering the insertion site with a sterile bandage.
|
Previously discussed in prior section.
|
|
Active Comparator: 5% Lidocaine Patch
5% lidocaine patch will be placed at the point of maximal tenderness upon palpation.
Location of placement will be described and instructed by physician and placed by nursing staff.
|
Will place lidocaine patch onto skin overlaying point of maximal tenderness
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
absolute change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain
Time Frame: 0 minutes and 20-minutes post- treatment, and every 30-60 minutes thereafter until discharge or admission and we will give the patient a hand out so that they can record their pain scores for up to 5 days after their emergency department visit.
|
Pain on a scale of 1-10.
Minimum value is 1, maximum value is 10.
Higher score means higher level of pain while lower score means lower level of pain.
|
0 minutes and 20-minutes post- treatment, and every 30-60 minutes thereafter until discharge or admission and we will give the patient a hand out so that they can record their pain scores for up to 5 days after their emergency department visit.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
use of other medications for treatment of pain including medications administered
Time Frame: From initiation of the study up to 5 days post discharge
|
How often and which medications did the patient require in emergency department and upon discharge to control their pain
|
From initiation of the study up to 5 days post discharge
|
|
disposition times
Time Frame: From initiation of the study up to the point the patient is discharged from the emergency department
|
Number of minutes it takes to discharge or admit the patient from first contact
|
From initiation of the study up to the point the patient is discharged from the emergency department
|
|
satisfaction/experience surveys regarding their treatment
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention is performed/administered
|
We will administer satisfaction/experience surveys to assess for any discomfort or relief from the intervention
|
Immediately after the intervention is performed/administered
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jonathan Lee, MD, UCI Department of Emergency Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Garvey TA, Marks MR, Wiesel SW. A prospective, randomized, double-blind evaluation of trigger-point injection therapy for low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Sep;14(9):962-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198909000-00008.
- Skootsky SA, Jaeger B, Oye RK. Prevalence of myofascial pain in general internal medicine practice. West J Med. 1989 Aug;151(2):157-60.
- Scott NA, Guo B, Barton PM, Gerwin RD. Trigger point injections for chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Pain Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):54-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00526.x. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
- Yanuck J, Saadat S, Lee JB, Jen M, Chakravarthy B. Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial on Trigger Point Injections With 1% Lidocaine Versus Conventional Approaches for Myofascial Pain in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
- Annaswamy TM, De Luigi AJ, O'Neill BJ, Keole N, Berbrayer D. Emerging concepts in the treatment of myofascial pain: a review of medications, modalities, and needle-based interventions. PM R. 2011 Oct;3(10):940-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.06.013.
- Affaitati G, Fabrizio A, Savini A, Lerza R, Tafuri E, Costantini R, Lapenna D, Giamberardino MA. A randomized, controlled study comparing a lidocaine patch, a placebo patch, and anesthetic injection for treatment of trigger points in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: evaluation of pain and somatic pain thresholds. Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):705-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.006.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease Attributes
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Perceptual Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Emergencies
- Myofascial Pain Syndromes
- Agnosia
- Facial Pain
- Organic Chemicals
- Anilides
- Amides
- Aniline Compounds
- Amines
- Acetanilides
- Lidocaine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20216439
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.