Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of nylon (polyamide) epidural catheter versus polyurethane epidural catheter in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia.
Background: Continuous epidural anesthesia is the most common anesthetic technique used in orthopedic surgery. However, the use of epidural catheters is associated with complications. The insertion of the catheter may be associated with intravascular or intrathecal placement, nerve root irritation, paresthesia, kinking, hematoma, or breakage during catheter removal.
Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups; group N, using Nylon catheter, and group P, using Polyurethane catheter.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ahmed M Shaat, MD
- Phone Number: 00201223482709
- Email: ahmedshaat99@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
El-Beheira
-
Damanhūr, El-Beheira, Egypt
- Recruiting
- Damanhour Teaching Hospital
-
Contact:
- Ahmed M Shaat, MD
- Phone Number: 00201223482709
- Email: ahmedshaat99@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≤ II
- Age from 21 to 60 years
- Body Mass Index (BMI) < 35
Exclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status > II
- Age < 21 years or > 60 years
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy and infection at the injection site)
- Uncooperative patients
- Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group N (n=30)
Continuous Epidural Anesthesia using Nylon (Polyamide) Epidural Catheter
|
Nylon (Polyamide) Epidural Catheter
|
|
Active Comparator: Group P (n=30)
Continuous Epidural Anesthesia using Polyurethane Epidural Catheter
|
Polyurethane Epidural Catheter
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean and Standard deviation of Time required for epidural catheter insertion (seconds) (mean±SD)
Time Frame: 2 minutes after identifying the epidural space by loss of resistance technique
|
Time interval from holding the epidural catheter by the anesthetist till removal of the Tuohy needle through the epidural catheter by the anesthetist
|
2 minutes after identifying the epidural space by loss of resistance technique
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean and Standard deviation of Time required for epidural catheter to anchor with the catheter connector (seconds) (mean±SD)
Time Frame: 2 minutes after removal of the Tuohy needle through the epidural catheter
|
Time interval from holding the epidural catheter by the anesthetist till anchoring it with the catheter connector by the anesthetist
|
2 minutes after removal of the Tuohy needle through the epidural catheter
|
|
Mean and Standard deviation of Time required for epidural catheter removal (seconds) (mean±SD)
Time Frame: 2 minutes after the end of the operation
|
Time interval from holding the epidural catheter by the anesthetist till removal of the epidural catheter by the anesthetist
|
2 minutes after the end of the operation
|
|
Number of participants and Rate of Catheter-related complications
Time Frame: 2 minutes after the end of the operation
|
Number of participants and Rate of: Catheter kink, Catheter stretch, Difficult catheter insertion, Intravascular placement, Intrathecal placement, Paresthesia, Failure (asymmetric, unilateral, no block at 30 min), Hematoma, Breakage during removal.
|
2 minutes after the end of the operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ahmed M Shaat, MD, Damanhour Teaching Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DTH: 21003
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.