The Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping and Conventional Physical Therapy in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North West
-
Tabuk, North West, Saudi Arabia, 71491
- University of Tabuk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pain caused by mechanical/nonspecific low back pain.
- Degeneration of the spine and intervertebral disc.
- The visual analog scale of pain 4 and above
- Low back pain for at least three months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Physical therapy treatment is taken in the past 6 months period
- Previous spinal surgery with fixation
- Structural anomalies
- Spinal cord compression
- Severe osteoporosis
- Acute infections
- Severe cardiovascular or metabolic diseases
- Pregnant women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Kinesio taping and Conventional Physical therapy
Kinesio taping with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Supervised Exercise therapy
|
Kinesio taping: The tape is measured from the sacrum to the 12th thoracic vertebra with forwarding flexion of the trunk.
The base is affixed to the insertion in the resting position.
The muscle is elongated and the base anchored with skin displacement.
The tape is then affixed with 10% stretch paravertebrally over the muscle bundles up to T12.
The tape is rubbed with the muscle in the elongated state.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device settings, such as the frequency of 80 Hz, the pulse width of 100 µs, and symmetrical biphasic waveform.
Four mediums sized (2 × 2 cm) carbon-impregnated rubber cutaneous electrodes were placed bilaterally in a standard dermatomal pattern over the most painful lumbar region.
The current intensity was increased up to the patient's perception of paraesthesia.
The supervised exercise therapy management consisted of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, gluteal and hamstring muscles, and strengthening exercises for the abdominal and back muscles.
Three sets of stretching exercises, each involving a 30-sec hold and 30-sec of rest repeated three times, were performed in three sessions per week over four weeks.
One set of strengthening exercises, consisting of 10 repetitions with a 5-sec hold, was performed in three sessions per week over four weeks.
|
|
Experimental: Conventional Physical therapy
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Supervised Exercise therapy
|
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device settings, such as the frequency of 80 Hz, the pulse width of 100 µs, and symmetrical biphasic waveform.
Four mediums sized (2 × 2 cm) carbon-impregnated rubber cutaneous electrodes were placed bilaterally in a standard dermatomal pattern over the most painful lumbar region.
The current intensity was increased up to the patient's perception of paraesthesia.
The supervised exercise therapy management consisted of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, gluteal and hamstring muscles, and strengthening exercises for the abdominal and back muscles.
Three sets of stretching exercises, each involving a 30-sec hold and 30-sec of rest repeated three times, were performed in three sessions per week over four weeks.
One set of strengthening exercises, consisting of 10 repetitions with a 5-sec hold, was performed in three sessions per week over four weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: Six weeks
|
Pain, for the Average pain intensity over the last week was measured on a numerical pain rating scale, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain possible
|
Six weeks
|
|
Modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire
Time Frame: Six weeks
|
Disability were measured using the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI) which is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate functional physical disability
|
Six weeks
|
|
Lumbar range of motion-Modified Schober test
Time Frame: Six weeks
|
Lumbar flexion range of motion were measured by using modified Schober method
|
Six weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UT-79-11-2019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.