Acute Effects of Fascial Release Technique in Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair
The Investigation of Acute Effects of Fascia Technique in Patients With Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Dumlupınar, Çubuk
-
Ankara, Dumlupınar, Çubuk, Turkey, 06760
- Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Minimum 18 years old
- patients undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair after least six weeks surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- cervical discopathy
- shoulder osteoarthritis
- fracture or tumor of upper extremity
- adhesive capsulitis
- shoulder instability
- thoracic outlet syndrome
- neurologic or mental problems
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Control group
conventional physiotherapy
|
For individuals of control group, hot pack applied for 20 minutes in the sitting position, Interferential Current was applied for the analgesic effect at a constant 100 Hz frequency on the anterior, posterior, superior and inferior part of the operated shoulder.
By increasing the current slowly, the dosage of the current was adjusted to such a degree that the patient could tolerate it.
|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
conventional physiotherapy and fascial release
|
For individuals of control group, hot pack applied for 20 minutes in the sitting position, Interferential Current was applied for the analgesic effect at a constant 100 Hz frequency on the anterior, posterior, superior and inferior part of the operated shoulder.
By increasing the current slowly, the dosage of the current was adjusted to such a degree that the patient could tolerate it.
Fascial release technique was applied to the patients in the treatment group besides the control group program.
The technique was applied to the cervical, thoracolumbar and upper extremity areas until tissue loosening and releasing were felt.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain severity
Time Frame: Before treatment, the severity of pain at rest, during activity and at night was evaluated using VAS. The starting point of the line indicated "no pain" and the end point "unbearable pain" using a 10 cm horizontal line.
|
Pain is an unpleasant sensation and emotional experience.
|
Before treatment, the severity of pain at rest, during activity and at night was evaluated using VAS. The starting point of the line indicated "no pain" and the end point "unbearable pain" using a 10 cm horizontal line.
|
|
Pain severity
Time Frame: After treatment, the severity of pain at rest, during activity and at night was evaluated using VAS. The starting point of the line indicated "no pain" and the end point "unbearable pain" using a 10 cm horizontal line.
|
Pain is an unpleasant sensation and emotional experience.
|
After treatment, the severity of pain at rest, during activity and at night was evaluated using VAS. The starting point of the line indicated "no pain" and the end point "unbearable pain" using a 10 cm horizontal line.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Range of motion
Time Frame: Before treatment, the active flexion, abduction, internal and external ROM of the individuals was evaluated using a universal goniometer in the supine position.
|
Range of motion is the measurement of movement.
|
Before treatment, the active flexion, abduction, internal and external ROM of the individuals was evaluated using a universal goniometer in the supine position.
|
|
Range of motion
Time Frame: After treatment, the active flexion, abduction, internal and external ROM of the individuals was evaluated using a universal goniometer in the supine position.
|
Range of motion is the measurement of movement.
|
After treatment, the active flexion, abduction, internal and external ROM of the individuals was evaluated using a universal goniometer in the supine position.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional level
Time Frame: Before treatment, SPADI was used to evaluate the functional level consists of a total of 13 items, 5 of which determine the level of pain and 8 items that determine the level of disability.
|
Functional level was assessed by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) before and after treatment.
|
Before treatment, SPADI was used to evaluate the functional level consists of a total of 13 items, 5 of which determine the level of pain and 8 items that determine the level of disability.
|
|
Fear of movement
Time Frame: The scale consists of 17 questions which is about the injury or re-injury in work-related activities and fear-avoidance. A 4-point Likert system is used in the scale after treatment.
|
Fear of movement was evaluated by TAMPA Kinesiophobia Scale before and after treatment.
|
The scale consists of 17 questions which is about the injury or re-injury in work-related activities and fear-avoidance. A 4-point Likert system is used in the scale after treatment.
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: To determine the level of satisfaction with the treatment they received, it was asked the patients to give a score between 0 (not at all satisfied) and 10 (very satisfied) using VAS after treatment.
|
Patient satisfaction after treatment was assessed by VAS.
|
To determine the level of satisfaction with the treatment they received, it was asked the patients to give a score between 0 (not at all satisfied) and 10 (very satisfied) using VAS after treatment.
|
|
Functional level
Time Frame: After treatment, SPADI was used to evaluate the functional level consists of a total of 13 items, 5 of which determine the level of pain and 8 items that determine the level of disability.
|
Functional level was assessed by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) before and after treatment.
|
After treatment, SPADI was used to evaluate the functional level consists of a total of 13 items, 5 of which determine the level of pain and 8 items that determine the level of disability.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sgroi TA, Cilenti M. Rotator cuff repair: post-operative rehabilitation concepts. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Mar;11(1):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9462-7.
- Simmonds N, Miller P, Gemmell H. A theoretical framework for the role of fascia in manual therapy. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012 Jan;16(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
- Kain J, Martorello L, Swanson E, Sego S. Comparison of an indirect tri-planar myofascial release (MFR) technique and a hot pack for increasing range of motion. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jan;15(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FON 2017/71
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.