Ovarian Function of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Women Survivors

January 4, 2022 updated by: Hai-Qiang Mai,MD,PhD, Sun Yat-sen University

Effects of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy on Ovarian Function and Post-treatment Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

This is an observational cohort study aimed to explore the fertility concerns, fertility preservation strategies, fertility status (pregnancy and Ovarian Failure) and birth outcome among young woman Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on ovarian function and pregnancy outcome after treatment in female survivors of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, so as to clarify the relationship between ovarian dysfunction after treatment and pregnancy outcome, as well as clarify the relationship between pregnancy after treatment and tumour progression.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
602

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Haiqiang Mai
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Qiuyan Chen
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Shanshan Guo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Female NPC patients (18 to 45 years old)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III ,with no distant metastasis
  2. Age between 18-45, female
  3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1
  4. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2.5×upper limit of normal (ULN),serum total bilirubin (TBIL) ≤2.0 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) .
  5. Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance rate≥60 ml/min or Creatinine ≤1.5× upper limit of normal value.
  6. No history of infertility.
  7. No history of hysterectomy or bilateral ovariectomy.
  8. Patient have signed on the informed consent, and well understood the objective and procedure of this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed with keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx.
  2. Women in the period of pregnancy, lactation, or reproductive without effective contraceptive measures.
  3. Known history of other malignancies (except cured basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix).
  4. Patients with severe dysfunction of heart, liver, lung, kidney or marrow.
  5. Patients with severe, uncontrolled disease or infections.
  6. Refuse or fail to sign the informed consent .
  7. Patients with personality or mental disorders, incapacity or limited capacity for civil conduct.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Premature Ovarian Failure (POF)
Time Frame: 3 years after Radiotherapy
Premature Ovarian Failure (POF) was defined as menopause before age 40 years. Menopause was defined as cessation of menstruation at least 1 year before the date of the survey in the absence of pregnancy, breastfeeding, continuous use of progestagens or other medication causing amenorrhea, or surgical removal of uterus and/ or ovaries.
3 years after Radiotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progress-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 3 years after Radiotherapy
Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of registration to the date of the first progress at any site.
3 years after Radiotherapy
Pregnancy and birth outcome
Time Frame: Within 6 month of diagnosis, or 3-5years after Radiotherapy

The pregnancy history and pregnancy outcome of female Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients before diagnosis of NPC would be investigate Within 6 months of diagnosis.

The pregnancy events and birth outcome of female NPC patients after diagnosis of NPC would be investigate among 3 to 5years after Radiotherapy.
Within 6 month of diagnosis, or 3-5years after Radiotherapy
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 3 years after Radiotherapy
The Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the duration from the date of registration assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up.
3 years after Radiotherapy
Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival (LRFS)
Time Frame: 3 years after Radiotherapy
The Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival (LRFS) is evaluated and calculated from the date of registration until the day of first locoregional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit
3 years after Radiotherapy
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)
Time Frame: 3 years after Radiotherapy
The DMFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of registration until the day of first distant metastases or until the date of the last follow-up visit.
3 years after Radiotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 10, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 4, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Ovarian Function of NPC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings