Evaluation of Hearing Aid Benefit
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Aurora, Illinois, United States, 60504
- Phonak Audiology Research Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Moderate to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss
- Willingness to wear custom hearing instruments during the study.
- Age-normal cognition
- Ability to attend on-site study visits.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental
All participants will be fit with the study hearing aid and under go the same testing conditions.
|
Participants will complete testing while using a novel hearing aid which has been fit to compensate for their hearing loss.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Speech Intelligibility in Quiet.
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 15
|
Speech intelligibility for monosyllabic words presented in quiet.
The words are presented at a fixed level and the percentage of words correctly repeated is calculated.
A higher percentage is better.
This was done in both unaided and aided conditions.
|
Day 1 and Day 15
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Speech Intelligibility in Noise, Expressed as the Signal to Noise Ratio at Which Participant Can Correctly Repeat 50% of the Words
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 15
|
Speech intelligibility on key words for sentences presented in noise.
Noise is presented at a fixed level, and the words are presented at adaptive levels, below and above the noise level.
A negative number is better, because it indicates the participant can correctly repeat 50% of the words when the words are below the level of noise.
This was done at baseline in the unaided condition on Day 1 of the study, and in the aided condition on Day 15.
|
Day 1 and Day 15
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kevin Seitz-Paquette, AuD, Sonova AG
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SRF-487
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.