Bringing Education Through Technology, Empathic Listening, and Research (BETTER)
Project BETTER: Bringing Education Through Technology, Empathic Listening, and Research - A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Caitlin E Martin, MD, MPH
- Phone Number: 804-628-7023
- Email: caitlin.martin@vcuhealth.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Dace S Svikis Pickens, PhD
- Phone Number: 804-827-1184
- Email: dssvikis@vcu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
- Virginia Commonwealth University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female
- ≥18 years of age
- Meet criteria for Opioid Use Disorder
- Currently receiving MOUD pharmacotherapy (including buprenorphine, buprenorphine/naloxone, or methadone)
- Pregnant (<34 weeks EGA)
- Initial in-person visit at OB MOTIVATE clinic for the current pregnancy ≤10 weeks ago
Exclusion Criteria:
- Considering/planning adoption
- Present with a serious cognitive/psychiatric impairment
- Existing language barriers making true informed consent impossible
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Brochure
|
|
|
Experimental: Technology-based program
|
Participants will be asked to complete three 25-minute modules covering the transition from pregnancy to postpartum, possible neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) or neonatal withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), and interactions with child welfare.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of the Intervention
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks of completing the intervention
|
Participants will complete a survey about the feasibility of the intervention consisting of 4 items rated on a 0 to 6 scale.
Scores will be summed to yield a final feasibility score ranging from 0 to 24.
Higher scores indicate higher feasibility.
|
Within 2 weeks of completing the intervention
|
|
Acceptability of the Intervention
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks of completing the intervention
|
Participants will complete a survey about the acceptability of the intervention consisting of 10 items rated on a 1 to 5 scale.
Higher scores indicated higher acceptability.
|
Within 2 weeks of completing the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Perceived Competence
Time Frame: Baseline to within 2 weeks of completing the intervention, up to 5 weeks
|
Participants will complete a survey assessing their feelings of competence related to the information covered by the intervention.
The items will be rated on a 1 to 7 scale.
Higher scores indicated higher perceived competence.
An increase in perceived competence suggests a greater sense of confidence, mastery, and belief in one's ability to achieve goals within that area.
This can be linked to positive outcomes like improved performance, motivation, and goal attainment.
A decrease in perceived competence indicates a diminished sense of self-efficacy and belief in one's abilities, potentially leading to reduced motivation, avoidance of challenges, and lower engagement.
|
Baseline to within 2 weeks of completing the intervention, up to 5 weeks
|
|
Change in Parental Competence
Time Frame: Baseline to within 2 weeks of completing the intervention, up to 5 weeks
|
Participants will complete a survey assessing their feelings of competence related to the parenting.
The items will be rated on a 1 to 6 scale.
An increase in perceived competence suggests a greater sense of confidence, mastery, and belief in one's ability to achieve goals within that area.
This can be linked to positive outcomes like improved performance, motivation, and goal attainment.
A decrease in perceived competence indicates a diminished sense of self-efficacy and belief in one's abilities, potentially leading to reduced motivation, avoidance of challenges, and lower engagement.
|
Baseline to within 2 weeks of completing the intervention, up to 5 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Caitlin E Martin, MD, MPH, Virginia Commonwealth University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HM20023314
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.