Effectiveness of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Effectiveness of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Single-center Retrospective Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Liège, Belgium, 4000
- CHU de Liege
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Eligible patients were adults undergoing elective aseptic revision of hip arthroplasty at the department of orthopedic surgery of the University Hospital of Liege between 01 January 2011 and 31 December 2020.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing revision for infection or with local malignancies were excluded from this study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Use
Patients in whom the cell saver was effectively used
|
The effective use of the cell saver was defined as the ability to re-transfuse at least 125 mL of re-suspended red blood cells with a hematocrit of 60 %.
|
|
Not Use
Patients in whom the cell saver wasn't effectively used
|
The effective use of the cell saver was defined as the ability to re-transfuse at least 125 mL of re-suspended red blood cells with a hematocrit of 60 %.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cell savage use
Time Frame: during the surgical procedure
|
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in whom the cell saver was effectively used (%)
|
during the surgical procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Re-infused
Time Frame: during the surgical procedure
|
Total volume of re-suspended blood re-infused (mL)
|
during the surgical procedure
|
|
Hemoglobin
Time Frame: during the surgical procedure
|
Post-operative hemoglobin level (g/dL)
|
during the surgical procedure
|
|
Allogenic Transfusion
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The need for allogenic blood transfusion (unit)
|
7 days
|
|
Aspirated blood
Time Frame: during the surgical procedure
|
The total volume of blood aspirated into the reservoir (mL)
|
during the surgical procedure
|
|
Fluid
Time Frame: during the surgical procedure
|
The total amount of fluid infused (mL)
|
during the surgical procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Greenky M, Shaner J, Rasouli MR, Han SB, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ. Intraoperative blood salvage in revision total hip arthroplasty: who benefits most? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1298-300. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.009. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
- Palmer AJR, Lloyd TD, Gibbs VN, Shah A, Dhiman P, Booth R, Murphy MF, Taylor AH, Kendrick BJL; collaborators. The role of intra-operative cell salvage in patient blood management for revision hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2020 Apr;75(4):479-486. doi: 10.1111/anae.14989. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
- Rigal JC, Riche VP, Tching-Sin M, Fronteau C, Huon JF, Cadiet J, Boukhari R, Vourc'h M, Rozec B. Cost of red blood cell transfusion; evaluation in a French academic hospital. Transfus Clin Biol. 2020 Nov;27(4):222-228. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
- Goel R, Patel EU, Cushing MM, Frank SM, Ness PM, Takemoto CM, Vasovic LV, Sheth S, Nellis ME, Shaz B, Tobian AAR. Association of Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions With Venous Thromboembolism in a North American Registry. JAMA Surg. 2018 Sep 1;153(9):826-833. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1565.
- Walsh TS, Palmer J, Watson D, Biggin K, Seretny M, Davidson H, Harkness M, Hay A. Multicentre cohort study of red blood cell use for revision hip arthroplasty and factors associated with greater risk of allogeneic blood transfusion. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108(1):63-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer326. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Cell-salvage
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.