Efficacy of RestoreX Penile Traction Therapy In Preserving Erectile Function Post-Prostatectomy

August 24, 2026 updated by: Landon Trost, Charitable Union for the Research and Education of Peyronie's Disease
Evaluate the efficacy of the RestoreX penile traction device in preserving erectile function in men undergoing robotic-assisted prostatectomy. This study will evaluate men undergoing prostatectomy with bilateral nerve preservation and preserved baseline erectile function (moderate ED or better). The primary outcome will be changes in the IIEF-EFD scores between groups at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include differences in questionnaire outcomes at 3, 6, and 9 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background and Preliminary Data

The treatment of prostate cancer results in several known sexual dysfunctions/risks, including erectile dysfunction, orgasmic dysfunction, ejaculatory dysfunction, penile curvature (Peyronie's disease), and reduced penile length. Although all forms of prostate cancer treatment are associated with many of these changes, prostatectomy currently has the most data available on sexual function outcomes. Among the dysfunctions, erectile dysfunction has remained a very challenging adverse effect without effective preventative therapies. Specifically, prior randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of PDE5 inhibitors (vardenafil and tadalafil) have failed to demonstrate improved erectile function preservation post-operatively.

Recently, out team conducted a single-center randomized, controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a novel penile traction therapy (PTT) device, RestoreX at preventing penile length loss post-prostatectomy. In addition to meeting the primary outcome of achieving improved penile length compared to controls, the study unexpectedly demonstrated improvements in erectile function in the treatment group compared to controls. Results were also consistent with two other prior randomized, controlled trials, one of which demonstrated improved erectile function in men with Peyronie's Disease and the other in men with diabetes mellitus (unpublished).

As these findings represent the first known therapy which resulted in preserved erectile function post-prostatectomy, we sought to perform a larger, multi-center study in an attempt to confirm or refute findings.

Investigational Device

RestoreX is a PTT device developed by PathRight Medical using technology licensed from the Mayo Clinic. The device is classified as class I (orthotic) and does not require clinical trials to prove safety or efficacy. Mayo Clinic has previously performed 3 randomized controlled trials which have confirmed the safety of the device as well as efficacy in improving erectile function and penile length in various cohorts of men.

The device has two functional aspects. The first is the ability to provide direct traction on the penis. The second is the ability to provide counter-bending forces, to treat conditions such as Peyronie's disease (bent penis). In the current study, only the direct traction aspects of the device will be utilized.

Study Rationale

PTT with Restorex has been shown to improve erectile function in several clinical scenarios, including in men with Peyronie's disease, men with diabetes mellitus (unpublished), and post-prostatectomy. As no therapy has ever been shown to improve erectile function or prevent loss of erectile function post-prostatectomy, we felt that there was significant clinical value in performing a large, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial to affirm or refute the efficacy of Restorex PTT in preserving erectile function post-prostatectomy.

Potential Benefits

There are several anticipated benefits to using PTT following prostatectomy. As loss of penile length results in several issues including loss of sexual function, cosmetic concerns, and difficulty in maintaining hygiene (incontinence resulting in yeast infections), the ability to maintain or restore length post-prostatectomy may mitigate these issues. Our team has previously demonstrated that Restorex PTT significantly improved penile length post-prostatectomy. Although this is an anticipated beneficial effect of therapy, we will not be specifically evaluating this outcome in the current study.

In addition to improved penile length, our prior investigations have demonstrated preserved erectile function in men who received PTT with Restorex post-prostatectomy compared to controls. And among all patients in the three prior randomized, controlled trials evaluating Restorex, no significant or long-term adverse events were reported, highlighting the safety of the therapy.

Anticipated Duration of the Clinical Investigation

The overall study will be scheduled for 3 years, to permit adequate time for enrollment and follow-up. The intervention phase will include 5 months of randomized treatment (for the treatment arm), and 3 months of open label treatment (for all arms).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic Arizona
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Research Coordinator
          • Phone Number: 480-574-1782
    • Illinois
    • New Jersey
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
    • Utah
      • Orem, Utah, United States, 84057
        • Recruiting
        • The Male Fertility and Peyronie's Clinic
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Holli Burgon
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy
  • >18 years old
  • Have a regular sexual partner for at least 6 months prior to study enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requiring adjuvant radiation therapy or androgen deprivation / androgen blockade post-operatively (by the time of enrollment)
  • Baseline severe erectile dysfunction as measured by the IIEF-EFD
  • Urethral complications from prostatectomy at the time of baseline visit including contrast extravasation, anastomotic dehiscence of vesicourethral anastomosis, need for re-doing of vesicourethral anastomosis intra-operatively

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment Arm
Men will begin utilizing PTT 30-60 minutes daily for 5-7 days weekly beginning 1 month post-prostatectomy until 6 months. After 6 months, they will have the option to continue to use the therapy for 3 additional months or discontinue at their discretion.
Device: RestoreX 1-6 months (randomized phase)
Study participants are recommended utilize the device for 30-60 minutes, 5-7 days a week starting at 1 month post-prostatectomy and continuing until 6 months.
Device: RestoreX 6-9 months (open label phase)
Both the treatment and control arms will be allowed to use the therapy from 6-9 months post-prostatectomy (open label phase). Only straight traction will be used (no counterbending).
Active Comparator: Control
Men will not utilize PTT for the first 6 months post-prostatectomy. Beginning at 6 months, they may utilize PTT if they desire (open label) until 9 months post-prostatectomy.
Device: RestoreX 6-9 months (open label phase)
Both the treatment and control arms will be allowed to use the therapy from 6-9 months post-prostatectomy (open label phase). Only straight traction will be used (no counterbending).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Erectile Function Post-Prostatectomy
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare erectile function between treatment and control cohorts, as assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function, Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EFD) at 6-months post-prostatectomy. IIEF-EFD scores 1-30, with higher scores representing better function.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-erectile function domains of the International Index of Erectile Function
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare the non-erectile function domains of the International Index of Erectile Function between cohorts. This represents 4 additional scales, with min/max being 0-10, 0-10, 0-15, and 0-10; higher scores indicated better function.
6 months
International Index of Erectile Function from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare International Index of Erectile Function subdomains within cohorts from baseline to 6 months. Scale 1-30, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
6 months
Adverse events at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate number of participants reporting adverse events at 3 months.
3 months
Adverse events at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Evaluate number of participants reporting adverse events at 6 months
6 months
Adverse events at 9 months
Time Frame: 9 months
Evaluate number of participants reporting adverse events at 9 months
9 months
International Index of Erectile Function from baseline to 9 months
Time Frame: 9 months
Compare International Index of Erectile Function domains at 9 months compared to baseline. Scale is 1-30 with higher scores indicating better function.
9 months
International Index of Erectile Function between groups at 9 months
Time Frame: 9 months
Compare International Index of Erectile Function domains at 9 months between cohorts (treatment arm, control). Scale is 1-30 with higher scores indicating better function.
9 months
Subjective questionnaire at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare subjective questionnaire results between cohorts at 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Charitable Union for the Research and Education of Peyronie's Disease

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 14, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 14, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CUREPD 104

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified study results will be made available to other study investigators.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available for 1 year after the study is completed.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Invited centers which have enrolled patients will have access to the de-identified data if desired.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings