Clinical Success of Different Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Procedures (TransHepatic)

August 27, 2023 updated by: Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH

Defining the Clinical Success of Different Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Procedures

The clinical success of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage procedures (PTBDs) is usually measured by the the decrease of the serum bilirubin value. However, the bilirubin value can be biased by other disease conditions. Furthermore, the time course of the decrease of the bilirubin value after technically successful PTBD is not well known. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), a liver enzyme which is typically elevated in cholestatic liver diseases, might be a good alternative to bilirubin as an indicator for the clinical success of PTBDs. The aim of this study is to analyse the bilirubin level and the GGT level in patients with technically successful PTBD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The medical records of adult patients who have received a technically successful PTBD will be screened sytematically in terms of bilirubin and GGT values in the follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention. Bilirubin and GGT values have been routinely examinated every 1 to 3 days. PTBD comprises external plastic endoprosthesis, combined external and internal endoprosthesis and primary metal stent insertion. The respective three procedures are considered separately. As PTBD is a rare intervention which is used after failed or impossible endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) medical records will be screened from 2002 to 2022 (20 years). It is expected that for example a decrease of GGT after three days might indicate a successful procedure. This in turn might has an impact on the early demission of the patient. On the other side, the precise definition of successful PTBD by bilirubin or GGT value might help to make this procedure better comparable to other alternative biliary drainage procedures such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction and failed or impossible ERCP

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • technically successful PTBD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • technically not successful PTBD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Extrahepatic bile duct obstruction and failed ERCP

Patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction and obstructive jaundice have received a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.

The choice between an insertion of an external or an external/internal drainage has been made during the procedure depending on whether the guide wire could be accessed to the jejunum/duodenum or not.

The choice between internal/external drainage or a primary metal stent has been made by the investigators preference or was made on the basis of an existing malign bile duct obstruction or not.
Procedure: External plastic endoprosthesis
Ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture with insertion of an external plastic endoprosthesis if the duodenum or jejunum cannot be accessed by a guide wire
Procedure: Combined external internal plastic endoprosthesis
Ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture with insertion of an external/internal plastic endoprosthesis if the duodenum or jejunum can be accessed by a guide wire. No definitive drainage intended in initial procedure.
Procedure: Primary metal stent
Ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture with insertion of a self-expanding metal stent if the duodenum or jejunum can be accessed by a guide wire. A definitive drainage is intended in the initial procedure, for example in patients with malign bile duct obstruction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bilirubin value
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Change of serum bilirubin value
4 weeks
GGT value
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Change of serum bilirubin value
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Helios Kliniken Schwerin

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Schmitz, MD, Theresienkrankenhaus Mannheim, University of Heidelberg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PTBD retro 003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All data of the study will be available on request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings