Gastro-laryngeal Tube During Transesophageal Echocardiography (GLT)

September 28, 2022 updated by: Muhittin Calim, Bezmialem Vakif University

The Utility of Gastro-laryngeal Tube During Transesophageal Echocardiography: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

To analyze the effects of the use of Gastro-laryngeal Tube on intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, procedure comfort, and cardiologist and patient satisfactions during transesophageal echocardiography.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is an ultrasonic imaging method providing anatomic, functional and hemodynamic information by imaging the heart and thoracic vascular structures using a probe advanced through the esophagus toward the stomach. The probe, with an ultrasonic wave converter at the tip, is placed in the patient's esophagus and begins assessment at the closest location to the heart. This position allows detailed assessment of the heart. It is commonly used during heart surgery, while it is also used in outpatient practice during cardiology examinations for diagnostic purposes.

Currently, TEE is performed with the outpatient admission concept in procedure rooms of the relevant departments as a semi-invasive procedure. TEE provides relatively higher quality and detailed assessments compared to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). When images obtained with TEE are compared with TTE images, posterior structures like the interatrial septum, mitral valve, left atrium and pulmonary veins were reported to be assessed at superior levels. In addition to this advantage of TEE, the presence of the TEE probe in the oropharyngeal passage and need for deep sedation involve high complication risks. During sedation administration, the common use of the oropharyngeal passage by both cardiologist and anesthesiologist forms a risk in terms of airway management. Especially during deep sedation and analgesia, special equipment and manipulation may be required for the safety of airway management.

In modern medical approaches, priority has begun to be given to procedure comfort, along with diagnosis and treatment of the patient. With this aim, endoscopic esophagus procedures are frequently performed under sedation. Sedation administration is not an innocent procedure, and management includes many difficulties. The incidence of complications related anesthesia and the procedure is variable, but hypoxia, unplanned endotracheal intubation secondary to desaturation or aspiration, accidental tracheal insertion of gastroscope, bronchospasm, laryngospasm and hemodynamic instability may be encountered. A review of the literature stated the hypoxia incidence related to sedation was 1.5-70%. The broad interval of incidence is stated to be linked to the use, or not, of airway protective approaches.

The importance given to patient comfort and satisfaction and desire of endoscopist to perform procedures more reliably and with shared responsibility have opened the door to new research and innovations. This demand has motivated industry to develop new pharmaceutical agents and medical instruments. The gastro-laryngeal tube (GLT) is designed with the aim of ensuring the safety of airway management and optimum performance of endoscopy for esophageal procedures under deep sedation and is a new tool offered for use. GLT is a modification of a laryngeal tube allowing passage of the gastroscope or TEE probe, a suitable channel for manipulation and ensuring supraglottic airway control at the same time. There are two inflatable cuffs, one within the esophagus and the other in the hypopharynx. These cuffs ensure airway safety and stabilization of the gastro-laryngeal tube.

The investigators hypothesized that GLT, allowing passage of the TEE probe and ensuring supraglottic airway control, would provide more advantages in terms of hemodynamic stabilization, complications related airway management, cardiologist and patient satisfactions when used in a clinical setting. To date, there has been no detailed prospective clinical study analyzing the performance of the GLT during TEE. The present study sought to address this gap by performing a prospective clinical study to analyze the performance of the GLT during TEE. Primary outcome measures were safety of airway management, and cardiologist and patient satisfactions. This study also recorded demographic characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, level of hypoxemia, and duration of procedure as secondary outcome measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fatih
      • Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey, 34093
        • Muhittin Calim

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II
  • Aged 20-75 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 20 years old
  • Over 75 years old
  • An allergy to anesthetic drugs
  • Emergent procedure
  • Uncontrolled cerebrovascular disease
  • Drug and alcohol addiction
  • Performed oropharyngeal surgery
  • Patients who refused written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sedation and Analgesia
A standardized sedation and analgesia will be administered by an experienced anesthesiologist. After administration of lidocaine and atropine sulfate, and also preoxygenation (100% 4 L/min oxygen for 3 minutes), patients will be induced with propofol and fentanyl via intravenous route at doses calculated according to ideal body weight. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol infusion. Repetitive intravenous boluses of propofol will be administered, if required. Patients will be received oxygen (100%, 3 L/min) through a nasal cannula during sedation and analgesia.
Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted after induction of anesthesia. Number of attempts for successful transesophageal echocardiography will be recorded.
Other Names:
  • TEE
A questionnaire for cardiologist satisfaction will be measured on a grade of 0-4 (1= very bad, 2= bad, 3= good, 4= very good).
Other Names:
  • Questionnaire
A questionnaire for patient satisfaction will be measured on a grade of 0-4 (1= very bad, 2= bad, 3= good, 4= very good).
Other Names:
  • Questionnaire
Active Comparator: Gastro-laryngeal Tube
After administration of lidocaine and atropine sulfate, and also preoxygenation (100% 4 L/min oxygen for 3 min), patients will be induced with propofol and fentanyl. After induction of anesthesia, supraglottic airway device named Gastro-laryngeal Tube (GLT) will be inserted. Patients will be ventilated mechanically with a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg based on ideal body weight and a frequency of 12-14 breaths/min after inserting the GLT. Repetitive intravenous boluses of propofol will be administered, if required.
Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted after induction of anesthesia. Number of attempts for successful transesophageal echocardiography will be recorded.
Other Names:
  • TEE
A questionnaire for cardiologist satisfaction will be measured on a grade of 0-4 (1= very bad, 2= bad, 3= good, 4= very good).
Other Names:
  • Questionnaire
A questionnaire for patient satisfaction will be measured on a grade of 0-4 (1= very bad, 2= bad, 3= good, 4= very good).
Other Names:
  • Questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A questionnaire for cardiologist satisfaction
Time Frame: A questionnaire will be performed to cardiologist 30 minutes after the procedure
A questionnaire for cardiologist satisfaction will be measured on a grade of 0-4 (1= very bad, 2= bad, 3= good, 4= very good).
A questionnaire will be performed to cardiologist 30 minutes after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of attempts for successful transesophageal echocardiography
Time Frame: Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted during the procedure.
Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted after induction of anesthesia. Number of attempts for successful transesophageal echocardiography will be recorded.
Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted during the procedure.
A questionnaire for patient satisfaction
Time Frame: A questionnaire will be performed to the all patients 2 hours after the procedure
A questionnaire for patient satisfaction will be measured on a grade of 0-4 (1= very bad, 2= bad, 3= good, 4= very good).
A questionnaire will be performed to the all patients 2 hours after the procedure
Heart rate
Time Frame: From beginning of Anesthesia induction to the end of anesthesia (during perioperative period)
Heart rate is measured as beats/minute on the anesthesia monitor
From beginning of Anesthesia induction to the end of anesthesia (during perioperative period)
Mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: From beginning of Anesthesia induction to the end of anesthesia (during perioperative period)
Mean arterial pressure is measured as mmHg on the anesthesia monitor
From beginning of Anesthesia induction to the end of anesthesia (during perioperative period)
Peripheral oxygen saturation
Time Frame: From beginning of Anesthesia induction to the end of anesthesia (during perioperative period)
Peripheral oxygen saturation is measured as percentage (%) on the anesthesia monitor
From beginning of Anesthesia induction to the end of anesthesia (during perioperative period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • muhittincalim1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.