The Effect of Palliative Care Training on Symptom Management and Quality of Life in Chronic Heart Failure

March 14, 2022 updated by: Gülşah Çamcı, Marmara University

The Effect of Palliative Care Training on Symptom Management, Rehospitalization and Quality of Life in Chronic Heart Failure: : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Palliative care is of great importance because of poor quality of life and high mortality risk in advanced heart failure. This study was planned as a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of palliative care training on symptom management, rehospitalization, and quality of life among patients with heart failure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients were informed about the research and written informed consent was obtained. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews within two days before discharge. Patient information form and scales were applied to Patients in the intervention and control groups. Patients in the intervention group were received education after filling the forms. The training was given one by one at the hospital. One or two relatives of patients were included in the training. The patient was comfortably seated, and the room door was closed, face to face interaction was conducted. The patient and his/her relatives were allowed to ask questions during the training. The patient in the intervention group received at least 45 minutes of data collection from a case because of detailed training. It took about 15 minutes to collect data from a patient in the control group. In some patients, the training program was divided to be clearer. The patients were traced by telephone at the first, third, and sixth months after discharge. The investigator's phone number was presented to the patients and they were told that they could call at any time. Continuous communication was ensured by giving the educator's phone number to the patients. The training was repeated by contacting the phone. The intervention group was retrained about symptoms they experienced during their telephone interview. The training was given to the experimental group as planned. No modifications/changes were made to the intervention during the study. Special notes were taken for each patient. The effect of the education given on the quality of life and symptom management was evaluated with questionnaires. The intervention was adhered to as planned.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
84

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Marmara University
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Marmara U.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-year-old or over,
  • Class III and IV heart failure patients according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification,
  • Patients without any communication problem to prevent participation in the research [loss of hearing, visual impairment, lack of understanding/speaking in Turkish], can be contacted by telephone, are literate.
  • The patients who were diagnosed with heart failure at least six months ago accepted to participate voluntarily were also included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who wish to quit their study voluntarily during the study period and patients who died or worsened during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: palliative care education
The patients in the intervention group were presented palliative care training in addition to their usual care. The training period lasts at least 45 minutes. After the training, patients were given the book 'Palliative Care in Heart Failure'. In this training, patients were informed about heart failure and pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods for symptoms such as dyspnea, pain, constipation, depression, edema, tiredness, nausea. The patients were followed up by telephone at the first, third, and sixth months after discharge. The patient's symptoms and quality of life were re-evaluated in telephone follow-up. During the follow-up period, the patient's training related to symptoms was repeated. The patients were referred to the physician for the symptoms and problems which they experienced in the house.
Behavioral: palliative care educatiom
The patients in the intervention group were presented palliative care training in addition to their usual care
No Intervention: usual care
Firstly, the usual care provided to patients was described. It was determined that patients were not given regular and comprehensive training on heart failure, and no training was given on palliative care. Written educational material was not given to the patients. Patients were not followed up after discharge. Palliative care was not discussed with patients and their relatives. Also, they were not asked about their preferences. In usual care, Heart failure patients received medical treatment for their symptoms during hospitalization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Edmonton symptom assessment scale
Time Frame: six months
ESAS consists of 10 symptoms as tiredness, pain, feeling of well-being, nausea, depression, anxiety, lack of appetite, drowsiness, shortness of breath, and others. Each symptom is scored between 0 and 10. While Zero points indicate no symptoms, 10 points are severe of symptoms.
six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LVD-36-left ventricular dysfunction questionnaire
Time Frame: six months
The questionnaire consists of 36 questions and the questions are answered as true or false. The correct answers are collected and indicated as the total percentage. The score is 0-100. High scores indicate poor quality of life.
six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Marmara University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gülşah Çamcı, PhD, Marmara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MU-SBF-IHH-GC-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

After the article is published, the results of the study will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings