Study to Identify if OVR Health's VR-Kit is Safe to Use and Helps to Improve Focus, Attention and Reduce Worry & Rumination.
Study to Identify if OVR Health's VR-Kit is Safe to Use and Helps Individuals to Improve Focus, Attention and Reduce Worry & Rumination.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
- Citruslabs
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female over 18 years old
- Must be in good general health
- Self-reported with the following symptoms (as assessed by questions and questionnaires in study material):
- Finding it hard to let go of difficult thoughts.
- Looking out for signs of a potential threat in their environment (or in their body) that unhelpfully maintains their problem.
- Engaging in repetitive, unhelpful patterns of negative thinking (worry & rumination). • These may be due to a diagnosis of a mental health condition, but this is not required for entry into the study.
- Good understanding of written and spoken English
- Willing and able to give informed consent
- Willing and able to follow the study protocol
- Willing and able to use VR headset at home
- WiFi connection to connect VR headset at home
- Willing and able to return VR headset
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current diagnosis of epilepsy, dementia, or another neurological disease that may prevent the use of VR hardware and software
- Individuals with suicidal or self-harm thoughts
- Significant visual, auditory, or balance impairment
- Insufficient comprehension of English
- Primary diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse disorder, or personality disorder • Significant learning disability
- Current active suicidal plans or self-harm (in which case participant will be referred to appropriate crisis service)
- Receiving current alternative psychotherapy treatment
- Unwilling to provide consent
- Unwilling to follow the study protocol
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: VR - coaching arm
30 individuals to be enrolled in the intervention arm that also includes coaching sessions to support and encourage VR use (VR+coaching arm).
|
Virtual reality experience
|
|
Active Comparator: VR only - no coaching
30 individuals to be enrolled in the intervention arm without coaching (VR arm)
|
Virtual reality experience
|
|
No Intervention: No intervention - control arm
30 individuals to be enrolled in the control arm with no active intervention (comparator 2; control arm)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety of virtual reality device and reduction in worry and rumination (PHQ9)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Changes in perceived safety using the PHQ9 questionnaire (Scale 0-3).
|
5 weeks
|
|
Safety of virtual reality device and reduction in worry and rumination (Perseverative Thinking score )
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Changes in perceived safety using the Perseverative Thinking score (Scale 0-4).
|
5 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Impact of coaching on virtual reality intervention effectiveness (PHQ9)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Changes in the PHQ9 questionnaire (0-3) in comparison to Group 2 (no coaching) and placebo arm (no intervention) with a lower score showing fewer symptoms.
|
5 weeks
|
|
Impact of coaching on virtual reality intervention effectiveness (Perseverative Thinking scor)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Changes in the Perseverative Thinking score (0-4) in comparison to Group 2 (no coaching) and placebo arm (no intervention) with a lower score showing fewer symptoms.
|
5 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20213Oxford
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.