The Emergency Department Longitudinal Integrated Care (ED-LINC2)

December 2, 2025 updated by: Lauren Whiteside, University of Washington

The Emergency Department Longitudinal Integrated Care Effectiveness Randomized Trial Targeting Opioid Use and Related Comorbidity From the ED

Collaborative care is a comprehensive patient-centered model of healthcare delivery targeting behavioral health or substance use that stems from the chronic disease management framework. The intervention being tested ('Emergency Department Longitudinal Integrated Care' or ED LINC) derives from the collaborative care model and has demonstrated feasibility in previous studies.

This study expands on the model to test the effectiveness of the ED-LINC intervention when compared with usual care. The study team primarily hypothesizes that patients randomized to the ED-LINC intervention, when compared to patients randomized to usual care, will demonstrate: 1) significant reductions in self-report illicit opioid use, 2) significant increases in initiation and retention of medications for opioid use disorder, and 3) significant reductions in ED utilization.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized clinical trial designed to test the effectiveness of the multi-component ED-LINC intervention. Patients with moderate or severe OUD seeking medical care at 2 EDs in Seattle, Washington, who provide informed consent will be randomized to the ED-LINC intervention (n=250) or usual care control (n=250) conditions.

ED-LINC will include: 1) overdose education, 2) brief bedside intervention targeting motivation to engage in outpatient care, 3) a patient-centered approach to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) using a treatment decision support tool, 4) longitudinal and proactive care management which will proceed for approximately 3 months, and 5) weekly caseload supervision allowing for stepped-up care targeting opioid use and comorbidity. This intervention will use the Emergency Department Information Exchange (EDIE) to re-engage patients with subsequent ED visits.

This study team developed the 'Emergency Department Longitudinal Integrated Care 2.0' intervention or 'ED-LINC' for patients with OUD to be initiated from the ED. In prior work, ED-LINC was feasible and retention in the study was high in both an intervention arm and a usual care control arm. Additionally, participants randomized to the ED-LINC arm were satisfied and acceptability of the intervention was high. Elements of ED-LINC are based on evidence-based treatments and are central components of collaborative care and will acknowledge the longitudinal care required for opioid use disorder and related substance abuse, mental health and medical comorbidity.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Layla A Anderson
  • Phone Number: 206-744-2556
  • Email: anderla@uw.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • Harborview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Moderate or Severe OUD based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID)
  • Currently have a phone or method of contact
  • Able to provide a phone number and one additional piece of contact information

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incarcerated or under arrest
  • Non-English speaking
  • Live beyond a 50 mile radius of Harborview Medical Center
  • Require active resuscitation in the ED or other clinical area at the time of Research Assistant (RA) approach
  • Are receiving palliative care services or hospice care for a chronic illness such as metastatic cancer
  • Are in the ED or hospital for a primary psychiatric emergency such as suicidal ideation or attempt and require emergent evaluation by a Psychiatrist
  • Receiving chronic opioid therapy (COT) defined as prescription opioids for most days out of the last 90 days for a chronic pain condition
  • In the ED for sexual assault
  • Enrolled or eligible for state-funded or hospital-funded care coordination program based on high utilization of the ED

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants assigned to this arm will receive usual care.
Experimental: ED-LINC Intervention
Patients assigned to the ED-LINC intervention will receive 1) overdose education, 2) brief bedside intervention targeting motivation to engage in outpatient care, 3) a patient-centered approach to MOUD using a treatment decision support tool, 4) longitudinal and proactive care management and 5) weekly caseload supervision allowing for stepped-up care targeting opioid use and comorbidity.
Other: ED-LINC
The ED-LINC intervention provides 1) overdose education, 2) brief bedside intervention targeting motivation to engage in outpatient care, 3) a patient-centered approach to MOUD using a treatment decision support tool, 4) longitudinal and proactive care management which will proceed for 3 months, and 5) weekly caseload supervision allowing for stepped-up care targeting opioid use and comorbidity.
Other Names:
  • Collaborative Care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Illicit Opioid Use Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline ED visit and 1, 3, 6 and 12-months after ED visit
To compare self-reported past-30 day illicit opioid use using the validated self-report measure of timeline followback (TLFB) in subjects receiving usual care or ED-LINC intervention over the course of the year after the index Emergency Department visit.
Baseline ED visit and 1, 3, 6 and 12-months after ED visit
Initiation of Medications for OUD
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare the frequency of initiation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) where MOUD includes buprenorphine, methadone and/or naltexone in subjects receiving usual care or ED-LINC intervention over the course of the year after the index Emergency Department visit using statewide data for prescriptions and Medicaid billing data for medication administration augmented with patient self-report MOUD at scheduled follow-up intervals.
12 months
Change in Emergency Department visits
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
To compare changes over time in Emergency Department visits in subjects receiving usual care or ED-LINC intervention; Emergency Department visits will be measured by the Emergency Department Information Exchange (an automated health information exchange) that caputures population-level Emergency Department utilization for all enrolled participants.
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention effect when associated with Methamphetamine use
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Explore the impact of methamphetamine use, as measured by the timeline follow-back (TLFB) which is a validated patient self-report measure of days of methamphetamine use over a 30 day-period, on intervention treatment effects.
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Time to Initiation of MOUD
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare time to initiation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) where MOUD includes buprenorphine, methadone and/or naltexone in subjects receiving usual care or ED-LINC intervention over the course of the year after the index Emergency Department visit.
12 months
Engagement in Medications for OUD
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare the frequency of engagement in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) where MOUD includes buprenorphine, methadone and/or naltexone in subjects receiving usual care or ED-LINC over the course of the year after the index Emergency Department visit using statewide data for prescriptions and Medicaid billing data for medication administration augmented with patient self-report MOUD at scheduled follow-up intervals.
12 months
Retention in Medications for OUD
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare the frequency of retention in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) where MOUD includes buprenorphine, methadone and/or naltexone in subjects receiving usual care or ED-LINC intervention over the course of the year after the index Emergency Department visit visit using statewide data for prescriptions and Medicaid billing data for medication administration augmented with patient self-report MOUD at scheduled follow-up intervals.
12 months
Intervention effect when associated depression
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Explore the impact of depression in the past 30-days as measured by self-report PHQ-9 at baseline on intervention treatment effects.
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Intervention effect when associated anxiety
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Explore the impact of anxiety in the past 30-days as measured by self-report GAD-7 at baseline on intervention treatment effects.
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Intervention effect when associated PTSD
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Explore the impact of PTSD in the past 30-days as measured by self-report PCL-C at baseline on intervention treatment effects.baseline on intervention treatment effects.
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Intervention effect when associated current pain
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Explore the impact of pain in the past week as measured by the self-report 3-item PEG at baseline on intervention treatment effects.
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Intervention effect when patient has exposure to MOUD in prior 12 months
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Explore the impact of any past 12-month MOUD exposure prior to enrollment where MOUD includes buprenorphine, methadone and/or naltexone assessed from review of medical records, using statewide data for prescriptions and Medicaid billing data for medication administration augmented with patient self-report MOUD obtained at baseline on the intervention treatment effect.
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Intervention effect by sex
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Explore the impact of patient sex as measured by patient self-report at baseline on intervention treatment effects
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Intervention effect when patient reports using illicit fentanyl at baseline
Time Frame: Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup
Explore the impact of fentanyl use as measured by any patient self-report fentanyl use in the past 30-days at baseline on the intervention treatment effect
Index Emergency Department visit to 12-months followup

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Washington

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lauren K Whiteside, MD, MS, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 2, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00012599
  • R01DA051462 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on ED-LINC

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings