Evaluation of the Individual Early Psychoeducation Program for Schizophrenic Disorders in Inpatients (PEPITS)

April 22, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Tours

Evaluation of the Individual Early Psychoeducation Program for Schizophrenic Disorders in Inpatients: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial

Schizophrenia affects about 0.7% of the population. Poor insight, which is common in this disease, linked to poor drug compliance is leads to rehospitalisation with major impact on quality of life. Indeed, many patients relapse with exacerbation of symptoms.

Psychoeducation can improve therapeutic alliance and medication compliance.

In this context, an individual psycho-education program (PEPITS) has been developed. PEPITS carried out by nurses during the initial stages of hospitalisation.

The hypothesis is that PEPITS program will decrease relapse and improve the compliance and insight and and so the quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Blois, France
        • Withdrawn
        • Serrvice de Psychiatrie
      • Chinon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Emmanuelle BODIN
      • Dreux, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Contact:
          • Jessica PÉTÉ SARAROLS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jessica PÉTÉ SARAROLS
      • Fleury-les-Aubrais, France
        • Withdrawn
        • Service de psychiatrie
      • La Roche sur Yon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Contact:
          • Mathilde JOUIN
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mathilde JOUIN
      • Neuilly-sur-Marne, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Contact:
          • Aurélie FLORENTIN
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Aurélie FLORENTIN
      • Rennes, France
        • Recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Contact:
          • Béatrice SURGET
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Béatrice SURGET
      • Saint-Maurice, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Contact:
          • Damien CROGUENNEC
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Damien CROGUENNEC
      • Sainte-Gemmes-sur-Loire, France
        • Recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Contact:
          • Efflam BREGEON
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Efflam BREGEON
      • Sotteville-lès-Rouen, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Contact:
          • Hélène LECUYER
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hélène LECUYER
      • Tours, France
        • Recruiting
        • Service de psychiatrie
        • Contact:
          • Alex MONDOULET
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alex MONDOULET

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Patient with a diagnosed and reported schizophrenic disorder announced :

    • Schizophrenia
    • Schizoaffective disorder
  • Or a diagnosed and reported Delusional Disorder
  • Express written consent by the participant after receiving information about the study
  • Be able to communicate verbally
  • Participant affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient who does not speak French
  • Participation in a psycho-education group in the last 2 years
  • Patient under legal protection or guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual care
Patients will receive the same psychiatric care as the experimental group except of the PEPITS programme.
Experimental: PEPITS programme

The programme has three main phases:

Phase I: Introduction phase (Session 1) Phase II: Pathology and care work phase (Sessions 2 - 3 - 4) Phase III: Recovery and "stepping stone" phase (Sessions 5 - 6 - 7) The programme provides information, keys and new skills to the patient through 3 phases focusing on pathology and recovery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of insight
Time Frame: From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
using the Introspection Self Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ)
From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of patient's quality of life
Time Frame: From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
using the S-QOL (Subjective - Quality of Life)
From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
Medication compliance
Time Frame: From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
by the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)
From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
Evolution of quality of life at work
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion

Measured by the Quality of life at work scale (Elizur and Shye scale, validated in French by Delmas, 2001) for nurses. Score from 1 to 6 per question.

Average of all scores.The higher the average, the higher the level of quality of life at work.

From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
Evolution of psychological well-being at work
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion

Scale of psychological well-being at work (Gilbert, Dagenais-Desmarais, & Savoie, 2011) for nurses. Score from 1 to 5 per question.

Average of all scores.The higher the average, the higher the Psychological well-being at work.

From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
Evolution of job satisfaction
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
Job satisfaction scale (Fouquereau & Rioux, 2002) for nurses. Score from 1 to 7 per question. Average of all scores. The higher the average, the higher the job satisfaction.
From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
Evolution of sense of self-efficacy
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
Self-efficacy scale (Nagels, 2008). Score from 1 to 4 per question. Average of all scores. The higher the average, the higher the sense of self-efficacy .
From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
Evolution of commitment to work
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
Work Engagement Scale (Scaufeli, Baker, & Salanova, 2006) for nurses. score from 1 to 6 per question. Average score. The higher the average, the higher the work vigour, dedication to work and absorption at work.
From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DR190062

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.