Evaluation of the Individual Early Psychoeducation Program for Schizophrenic Disorders in Inpatients (PEPITS)
Evaluation of the Individual Early Psychoeducation Program for Schizophrenic Disorders in Inpatients: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial
Schizophrenia affects about 0.7% of the population. Poor insight, which is common in this disease, linked to poor drug compliance is leads to rehospitalisation with major impact on quality of life. Indeed, many patients relapse with exacerbation of symptoms.
Psychoeducation can improve therapeutic alliance and medication compliance.
In this context, an individual psycho-education program (PEPITS) has been developed. PEPITS carried out by nurses during the initial stages of hospitalisation.
The hypothesis is that PEPITS program will decrease relapse and improve the compliance and insight and and so the quality of life.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Arnaud CHESSE
- Phone Number: +33(0)2.34.37.89.68
- Email: A.CHESSE@chu-tours.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marie LECLERC
- Phone Number: +33(0)2.47.47.46.64
- Email: m.leclerc@chu-tours.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Blois, France
- Withdrawn
- Serrvice de Psychiatrie
-
Chinon, France
- Recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Principal Investigator:
- Emmanuelle BODIN
-
Dreux, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Contact:
- Jessica PÉTÉ SARAROLS
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jessica PÉTÉ SARAROLS
-
Fleury-les-Aubrais, France
- Withdrawn
- Service de psychiatrie
-
La Roche sur Yon, France
- Recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Contact:
- Mathilde JOUIN
-
Principal Investigator:
- Mathilde JOUIN
-
Neuilly-sur-Marne, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Contact:
- Aurélie FLORENTIN
-
Principal Investigator:
- Aurélie FLORENTIN
-
Rennes, France
- Recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Contact:
- Béatrice SURGET
-
Principal Investigator:
- Béatrice SURGET
-
Saint-Maurice, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Contact:
- Damien CROGUENNEC
-
Principal Investigator:
- Damien CROGUENNEC
-
Sainte-Gemmes-sur-Loire, France
- Recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Contact:
- Efflam BREGEON
-
Principal Investigator:
- Efflam BREGEON
-
Sotteville-lès-Rouen, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Contact:
- Hélène LECUYER
-
Principal Investigator:
- Hélène LECUYER
-
Tours, France
- Recruiting
- Service de psychiatrie
-
Contact:
- Alex MONDOULET
-
Principal Investigator:
- Alex MONDOULET
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 65 years
Patient with a diagnosed and reported schizophrenic disorder announced :
- Schizophrenia
- Schizoaffective disorder
- Or a diagnosed and reported Delusional Disorder
- Express written consent by the participant after receiving information about the study
- Be able to communicate verbally
- Participant affiliated to a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Patient who does not speak French
- Participation in a psycho-education group in the last 2 years
- Patient under legal protection or guardianship
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Usual care
|
Patients will receive the same psychiatric care as the experimental group except of the PEPITS programme.
|
|
Experimental: PEPITS programme
|
The programme has three main phases: Phase I: Introduction phase (Session 1) Phase II: Pathology and care work phase (Sessions 2 - 3 - 4) Phase III: Recovery and "stepping stone" phase (Sessions 5 - 6 - 7) The programme provides information, keys and new skills to the patient through 3 phases focusing on pathology and recovery. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evolution of insight
Time Frame: From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
|
using the Introspection Self Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ)
|
From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evolution of patient's quality of life
Time Frame: From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
|
using the S-QOL (Subjective - Quality of Life)
|
From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
|
|
Medication compliance
Time Frame: From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
|
by the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)
|
From inclusion (T0) up to one year (T12) after randomisation
|
|
Evolution of quality of life at work
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
Measured by the Quality of life at work scale (Elizur and Shye scale, validated in French by Delmas, 2001) for nurses. Score from 1 to 6 per question. Average of all scores.The higher the average, the higher the level of quality of life at work. |
From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
|
Evolution of psychological well-being at work
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
Scale of psychological well-being at work (Gilbert, Dagenais-Desmarais, & Savoie, 2011) for nurses. Score from 1 to 5 per question. Average of all scores.The higher the average, the higher the Psychological well-being at work. |
From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
|
Evolution of job satisfaction
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
Job satisfaction scale (Fouquereau & Rioux, 2002) for nurses.
Score from 1 to 7 per question.
Average of all scores.
The higher the average, the higher the job satisfaction.
|
From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
|
Evolution of sense of self-efficacy
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
Self-efficacy scale (Nagels, 2008).
Score from 1 to 4 per question.
Average of all scores.
The higher the average, the higher the sense of self-efficacy .
|
From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
|
Evolution of commitment to work
Time Frame: From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
Work Engagement Scale (Scaufeli, Baker, & Salanova, 2006) for nurses.
score from 1 to 6 per question.
Average score.
The higher the average, the higher the work vigour, dedication to work and absorption at work.
|
From prior to their training in the programme up to 6 months after their first inclusion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DR190062
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.