Evaluation of Implant Stability in Low Quality Bone Following the Use of Osseodensifiers Versus Ridge Expanders
Evaluation of the Stability of Implants Placed in Low Quality Bone Following the Use of Osseodensification Technique Versus Ridge Expanders: Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Mariam Samir, Assis. lect.
- Phone Number: +201225113158
- Email: mariam.bibawi@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ahmed El Barbary, Assis. prof.
- Email: ahmed.barbari@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Single tooth missing in the maxillary region with D3 (350-850 HU) and D4 (150-350 HU) bone (Sultana et al., 2020).
A minimum of 4 mm residual buccolingual bone width at site of implant placement (Koutouzis et al., 2019).
- The recipient site of the implant should be free from any pathological conditions.
- No diagnosed bone disease or medication known to affect bone metabolism.
- Patients who are cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious.
- Patients having adequate inter-occlusal space of 8-10 mm (Fernández et al., 2017)
Exclusion Criteria:
Systemic conditions/diseases that contraindicate surgery (Jarikian et al., 2021).
- Patients who have any habits that might jeopardize the osseointegration process, such as current smokers (Vollmer et al., 2020).
- Patients with parafunctional habits that produce overload on implant, such as bruxism and clenching (Sultana et al., 2020).
- Alcohol or drug abuse (Ibrahim et al., 2020).
- Pregnant and lactating women.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Osseodensification technique group
10 patients will be randomly assigned to the osseodensification group so the implant osteotomy will be prepared using densah burs
|
using Densah burs to prepare implant osteotomy
|
|
Active Comparator: Ridge expansion screw group
10 patients will be randomly assigned to the ridge expansion screw group so the implant osteotomy will be prepared using ridge expansion screws
|
using Ridge expansion screws to prepare implant osteotomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant stability
Time Frame: change from baseline at 3 month
|
assessing the stability using Osstell
|
change from baseline at 3 month
|
|
Implant stability
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 month
|
assessing the stability using Osstell
|
change from baseline at 6 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Radiographic bone density
Time Frame: change from baseline at 3 month
|
using CBCT in mm
|
change from baseline at 3 month
|
|
Radiographic bone density
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 month
|
using CBCT in mm
|
change from baseline at 6 month
|
|
Change in crestal bone level
Time Frame: change from baseline at 3 month
|
using CBCT in mm
|
change from baseline at 3 month
|
|
Change in crestal bone level
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 month
|
using CBCT in mm
|
change from baseline at 6 month
|
|
Change in buccolingual bone width
Time Frame: change from baseline at 3 month
|
using CBCT in mm
|
change from baseline at 3 month
|
|
Change in buccolingual bone width
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 month
|
using CBCT in mm
|
change from baseline at 6 month
|
|
Patient reported outcomes
Time Frame: at time of surgery
|
10 mm Visual analogue scale from 1 to 10 with 1 minimal pain and 10 worst pain experience
|
at time of surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ahmed El Barbary, Assis. prof., main supervisor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 12722
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.