Effect of Implant Driver Facilitated Micro-osteo Perforation on the Rate of Tooth Movement.
Effect of Implant Driver Facilitated Micro-osteo Perforations on the Rate of Tooth Movement.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The experimental group will receive implant driver facilitated microosteoperforation on one side of the mouth( according to split mouth design) decided by random allocation.
After 3 months of extraction of upper first premolar ( according to planned orthodontic treatment), 3 microosteoperforation will be done with implant in an implant driver distal to canine. Surgical procedure will be done in local anesthesia, no flap will be raised. Alginate impressions will be taken before the procedure and 28 days after canine retraction has started, to measure the difference between rate of canine retraction on both sides. Measurement was done by a digital vernier caliper,
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sindh
-
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75200
- Bahria University Medical and Dental College
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Male and female
- Age 18- 45 years
- Class 2 div 1
- No systemic disease
- No radiographic evidence of bone loss
- No history of periodontal therapy
- No current active periodontal disease
- No smoking
- No gingivitis or untreated caries
- Probing depth < 4mm in all teeth
- Gingival index < 1mm
- Plaque index < 1mm
Exclusion Criteria:
- Long term use of antibiotics, phenytoin,cyclosporine, anti inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids and calcium channel blockers.
- Poor oral hygiene for more than 2 visits.
- Extreme skeletal class 2 malocclusion, overjet > 10mm, anb> 7
- Systemic disease
- Evidence of bone loss
- Past periodontal disease
- Current periodontal disease
- Smoking
- Gingivitis and caries
- Probing depth > 4mm
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: mop group
a group of patients with a class 2 divsion 1 dental malocclusion, overjet greater than 9 mm, extraction of upper first premolars planned, and it has been 3 months post extraction and before canine retraction is commenced.
|
3 micro-osteoperforations(in a vertical pattern) are done on the randomly allocated experimental side , distal to canine under local anesthesia. the other side of the mouth is used as a control. alginate impression is taken before the intervention .
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: mop group ( same)
a group of patients with a class 2 divsion 1 dental malocclusion, overjet greater than 9 mm, extraction of upper first premolars planned, and it has been 3 months post extraction and before canine retraction is commenced.
|
3 micro-osteoperforations(in a vertical pattern) are done on the randomly allocated experimental side , distal to canine under local anesthesia. the other side of the mouth is used as a control. alginate impression is taken before the intervention .
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparing rate of canine retraction between intervention and non-intervention side.
Time Frame: 28 days
|
distance from cusp tip of canine to mesio-buccal cusp tip of molar taken by digital vernier caliper.
|
28 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cheung T, Park J, Lee D, Kim C, Olson J, Javadi S, Lawson G, McCabe J, Moon W, Ting K, Hong C. Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Dec;150(6):958-967. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.030.
- Ozkan TH, Arici S. The effect of different micro-osteoperforation depths on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A single-center, single-blind, randomized clinical trial. Korean J Orthod. 2021 May 25;51(3):157-165. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.3.157.
- Aboalnaga AA, Salah Fayed MM, El-Ashmawi NA, Soliman SA. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0.
- Bolat Gumus E, Kinsiz E. Effects of miniscrew-facilitated micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement : A split-mouth, randomized controlled trial. J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Jan 13. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00371-6. Online ahead of print.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ERC 05/2018
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.