PVC Response ''Atrial Pace'' Inducing Atrial Tachycardias
Switching PVC Response ''Atrial Pace'' in ST JUDE Medical or Abbott ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) or CRT-D (Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) Devices to Off Mode Decreases the Burden of Atrial Tachycardia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The device of the subjects participating to the study is interrogated and the PVC response algorithm is switched from ''Atrial Pace'' to ''Off'' mode.
Subjects are also requested to fulfill the EQ-5D-3L and ICD8 questionaries before the change in the device programming and after the 12 months surveillance.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki University Central Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ST Jude Medical or Abbott physiological ICD or CRT-D device
- PVC response setting ''Atrial Pace''
- Atrial tachycardia episode duration > 30s preceded by ventricular extrasystole and atrial pace in year 2020 or 2021
Exclusion Criteria:
- Permanent atrial fibrillation, duration ≥ 6 months before the enrollment to the study
- PVC response has been switched off before enrollment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PVC response ''Off''
|
PVC algorithm change from Atrial Pace mode to Off
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of atrial tachycardia episodes per participant which is initiated after PVC followed by atrial sensed event and atrial pace after 330ms delay.
Time Frame: The number of these episodes is compared between year 2020 and 12 months preceding the change in the programming setting and 12 months afterwards.
|
Atrial tachycardia episode is considered as an episode which duration is >30s and atrial rate > 180 beats per minute.
|
The number of these episodes is compared between year 2020 and 12 months preceding the change in the programming setting and 12 months afterwards.
|
|
Number of any atrial tachycardia episodes and overall duration of atrial tachycardia episodes per participant.
Time Frame: The number of these episodes and overall duration of all atrial tachycardia episodes is compared between year 2020 and 12 months preceding the change in the programming setting and 12 months afterwards.
|
Atrial tachycardia episode is considered as an episode which duration is >30s and atrial rate > 180 beats per minute.
|
The number of these episodes and overall duration of all atrial tachycardia episodes is compared between year 2020 and 12 months preceding the change in the programming setting and 12 months afterwards.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Change in the quality of life analyzed with EQ-5D-3L and ICD8 questionaries'.
Time Frame: baseline and after 12 months surveillance
|
In EQ-5D-3L questionary the quality of life is measured in scale from 0 to 100 and in ICD8 questionary in scale from 0 to 32.
The overall score in both of the questionaries is compared at two time points.
|
baseline and after 12 months surveillance
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Markus Sane, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Friedman DJ, Chasten T, Anderson K, Mullenix J, Rider K, Sun AY. Premature ventricular contraction response-induced new-onset atrial fibrillation. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018 Nov 30;5(3):120-123. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2018.11.012. eCollection 2019 Mar. No abstract available.
- Liu Y, Yuan X. Logic Analysis of Arrhythmia Triggered by Pacemaker Special Functions - An Educational Presentation. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jun 1;36(3):412-415. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0630.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUS/627/2022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.