Slider Versus Tensioner Neural Mobilization in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Compare the Effects of Sliding With Tensioner Technique of Neural Mobilization in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The neurodynamic technique both sliders and tensioners results in changes of the mechanical or physiological function of nerve tissues along with the interface; restoring pressure gradients, relieving hypoxia and pain resulting in reducing associated symptoms.
Through clinical reasoning the nervous system seems to be the logical place for treatment and explanations and previous descriptions of this method have clarified the overall impact on quality of life in diabetic peripheral neuropathy but it doesn't discuss which technique of neural mobilization is more effective and its effects on diabetic peripheral neuropathic population. Within this reasoning it is important to determine which neurodynamic technique is more effective in improving quality of life and reduce pain in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Aaseya Syed, DPT
- Phone Number: 00923339837481
- Email: asiasyed72@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT(NMPR)
- Phone Number: 00923332238706
- Email: obaid.baig@riphah.edu.pk
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Mianwali, Punjab, Pakistan
- DHQ Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient having≥12score on Self report Leads Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Sign
- Patients with lower limb pain ≥4 to ≤7 on NPRS
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diabetic foot ulcer
- Complex regional pain syndrome
- Infection in lower limb
- Lower extremity amputation
- Discogenic pain
- Restricted joint deformity
- Dependency on chemical or drugs
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A
TENS, Stretching exercises, ROM exercises Sliding neural mobilization to femoral, sciatic, tibial nerve
|
Sliding neural mobilization to femoral, sciatic and tibial nerve
Stretching exercises
TENS
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B
TENS, Stretching exercises, ROM exercises Tensioner neural mobilization to femoral, sciatic, tibial nerve
|
Stretching exercises
TENS
Tensioner neural mobilization to femoral, sciatic and tibial nerve
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Michigan neuropathy screening instrument
Time Frame: 3 weeks
|
For screening the neuropathy; The MNSI questionnaire is self-administered.
Responses are added to obtain a total score.
'Yes' responses to questions 1-3, 5-6, 8-9, 11-12, 14-15 are each counted as one point.
'No' responses to questions 7 and 13 each count as one point.
Question 4 was considered to be a measure of impaired circulation and question 10 a measure of general asthenia and were not included in the published scoring algorithm.
A score of ≥ 7 was considered abnormal.
All 15 questions were included in the new scoring algorithms.
|
3 weeks
|
|
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks
|
Quantify the pain ranging from 0 to 10 in which zero means no pain and 10 severe pain
|
3 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life SF-36
Time Frame: 3 weeks
|
to assess the quality of life, SF-36 ; Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight.
The lower the score the more disability.
The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
|
3 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT(NMR), Riphah International University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, Malanda B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
- Pop-Busui R, Boulton AJ, Feldman EL, Bril V, Freeman R, Malik RA, Sosenko JM, Ziegler D. Diabetic Neuropathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(1):136-154. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2042. No abstract available.
- Iqbal Z, Azmi S, Yadav R, Ferdousi M, Kumar M, Cuthbertson DJ, Lim J, Malik RA, Alam U. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Pharmacotherapy. Clin Ther. 2018 Jun;40(6):828-849. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
- Feldman EL, Nave KA, Jensen TS, Bennett DLH. New Horizons in Diabetic Neuropathy: Mechanisms, Bioenergetics, and Pain. Neuron. 2017 Mar 22;93(6):1296-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.005.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- REC01253 Aaseya Syed
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.