Accelerated cTBS on Metabolic Dysfunction in People With Schizophrenia
The Effect and Safety of Accelerated Continuous Theta-burst Stimulation on Metabolic Dysfunction in People With Schizophrenia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Hunan
-
Changsha, Hunan, China, 410000
- Recruiting
- Second Xiangya Hospital Central South University
-
Contact:
- Dongyu Kang, MD
- Phone Number: +86 13787142461
- Email: kangdongyu@csu.edu.cn
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia in accordance with DSM-5
- BMI over 24
- Accepting antipsychotics stable treatment for more then 2 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with other mental disease in accordance with DSM-5
- Comorbid with other severe physiological disease
- Used antipsychotic, antidepressants, mood stabilizer, or other psychoactive substances before
- Drug or alcohol abuse
- Pregnant or lactating Contraindication to rTMS
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Real stimulation
Participants in the real stimulation group will receive accelerated cTBS with 1800 stimulation per session for 10 consecutive days, 5 sessions per day with a gap at least one hour, 50 sessions in total.
The stimulation will be conducted at left M1 area.
|
cTBS was administered at 80% of each participant's M1 area in a burst-firing pattern (3 pulses at 50 Hz) with a repetition frequency of 5 Hz (200 ms intervals).
During each session, participants received 1800 pulses (120 s).
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation
Participants in the sham stimulation group will receive the stimulation with coil vertical to the surface with other settings same as the real stimulation group.
|
Similar process with the accelerated theta burst stimulation with the coil 90 degrees tilted to the surface of the scalp, which could produce identical sound and vibration while avoiding real magnetic stimulation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of body weight
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
|
the change of participants weight
|
from baseline to 6 weeks
|
|
Change of body mass index
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
|
the change of participants BMI
|
from baseline to 6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Positive and Negative syndrome rating scale
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
|
Positive and Negative syndrome rating scale, from 30-210, higher score means worse symptoms.
|
from baseline to 6 weeks
|
|
Three Factor Eating Questionnaire
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
|
three domain regarding eating behavior, from 0-51, higher score means better.
|
from baseline to 6 weeks
|
|
Barrat impulsiveness scale
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
|
four domains regarding impulsiveness, from 26-104 higher score means higher impulse.
|
from baseline to 6 weeks
|
|
Self-Control Scale
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
|
five domains regarding self control ability, from 36-180 higher score means better self control.
|
from baseline to 6 weeks
|
|
Food picture stimulation Event-related potentials
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
|
Several components of event-related potentials were analyzed regarding various cognitive processes.
The data were analyzed using previously widely used pipelines to extract the characters of ERP components, for example, P3 and LPP, and compare its difference within groups and between groups through time.
ERP analysis will be conducted using EEGLAB and FieldTrip in MATLAB, and statistic analysis will be conducted using R studio and SPSS.
|
from baseline to 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- wu2022acTBS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.