Comparison on Radiotherapy Permanent Skin Marking With Lancets and an Electric Marking Device (COMFORTATTOO)
Research Study: Tattooing of Skin Landmarks in Radiotherapy: Comparison Between the System Traditional and Comfort Marker 2.0® (COMFORTATTOO)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Porto, Portugal, 4200-072
- Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Genti
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age at least 18 years old.
- Patients referred to our department to receive external beam radiation therapy.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1.
- Estimated fractionating schedule of at least 13 once-daily fractions.
- Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients requiring either immobilisation thermoplastic masks (for head or head and shoulders) or vacuum cushion.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Lancets
|
The set-up markings are created during the simulation session, after the CT simulation is acquired.
For the control group, patients' markings are tattooed using a 28-gauge disposable lancet and india ink.
After cleaning the excess ink, if the tattooing was considered unsuccessful, the process was repeated.
Markings arrangement followed our departmental protocol.
No limit on the maximum number of cutaneous reference points is specified.
|
|
Experimental: Comfort Marker 2.0
|
The set-up markings are created during the simulation session, after the CT simulation is acquired.
For the experimental group, patients' markings are tattooed using an electric marking device developed for set-up marking, the Comfort Marker 2.0® (CM), designed by CIVCO medical solutions, using the 0.2mm deep application depth and the brand-included black pigment.
After cleaning the excess ink, if the tattooing was considered unsuccessful, the process was repeated.
Markings arrangement followed our departmental protocol.
No limit on the maximum number of cutaneous reference points is specified.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patients' comfort
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Comfort is verbally assessed on the 11-point numeric pain scale.
As more than one reference point is tattooed, the patients are asked to give an overall score to the procedure.
|
Day 1
|
|
Effectiveness
Time Frame: up to 7 weeks
|
Effectiveness is assessed by the RTT team that delivered the daily fractions.
Skin markings are individually evaluated at several periods, specifically at the first fraction, then every 5 fractions, and one last time in the last fraction of RT.
These evaluations are scored on a 4-point graded scale (corresponding to bad, reasonable, good, and excellent).
|
up to 7 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
RTTs' satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 1
|
The RTT that executed the tattooing is asked to score the ease of the process on a three-point scale (easy, medium, and hard).
|
Day 1
|
|
Cosmesis
Time Frame: one of the last three days of irradiation
|
A photographic assessment is performed.
Every set-up marking is individually photographed on one of the last three days of treatment.
All photographs are scored by independent observers (both physicians and RTTs) blind to patient identity and treatment allocation, on a five-point scale (corresponding from bad to excellent cosmesis).
|
one of the last three days of irradiation
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tattoo fading
Time Frame: 6 months from the end of irradiation
|
A photographic assessment is performed.
Every set-up marking is individually photographed a.
All photographs are scored by indepe6 months after completion of the RT.
All photographs are scored by independent observers(both physicians and RTTs) blind to patient identity and treatment allocation, on a five-point scale (corresponding from bad to excellent fading).
|
6 months from the end of irradiation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CONFORTATTOO
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.