The Families Addressing Cancer Together Intervention for Parents With Cancer (FACT)

May 22, 2024 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT): A Pilot Randomized Trial

The proposed pilot randomized controlled trial will test the FACT (Families Addressing Cancer Together) intervention designed to improve parents' confidence and ability to talk about their cancer with their minor children. We will enroll 40 patients with cancer who have a minor child to participate in this single site, 6-week study. The primary hypothesis being tested is that an intervention that assists parents with their communication needs with their children can be feasible and acceptable when compared with a wait-list control condition.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Parents with cancer are encouraged to be "honest and open" with their minor children about their illness. However, many lack access to professional support for their communication needs. Without this support, parents with cancer and their children experience avoidable psychosocial distress. In order to better support parental communication needs in cancer, psychosocial interventions that can be implemented across clinical practice settings are needed. To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested FACT (Families Addressing Cancer Together) - a theory-guided, web-based psycho-educational intervention to help parents with cancer talk about their illness with their children in a developmentally appropriate way.

The proposed pilot randomized controlled trial will test the feasibility and acceptability of the FACT intervention. We will enroll 40 patients with cancer who have a minor child to participate in this single site, 6-week study. The primary hypothesis being tested is that an intervention that assists parents with their communication needs with their children can be feasible and acceptable when compared with a wait-list control condition. We will also explore preliminary effects of the intervention on parental communication and psychological outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent reviewed and signed;
  • Age equal to or above 18 years;
  • Ability to understand and comply with study procedures;
  • Able to complete all study measures and visits in English;
  • Be a parent (defined as biological, adoptive, foster, or step-parent), kin caregiver (defined as a relative or someone with a significant emotional relationship who provides full-time care and nurturing of a child), or legal guardian of a child age 3 to 17 years of age who can speak and understand English;
  • Have a diagnosis of Stage II-IV (or equivalent) invasive solid tumor not in surveillance or survivorship

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete self-report instruments due to illiteracy, neurologic illness, inability to speak or read English, or other causes;
  • Prior participation in the pilot trial or development and user testing protocol preliminary to this study;
  • No current or expected contact with their child; or
  • Existence of other co-morbid disease, which in the opinion of the investigator, prohibits participation in the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: FACT intervention
Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) intervention plus questionnaires
Behavioral: FACT
Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) is a web-based intervention that provides tailored communication support for parents with cancer.
No Intervention: Wait-list control condition
Participants assigned to the waitlist control condition only complete questionnaires during the study period. After they have completed their 6-week study activities, they will receive access to the FACT intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) Satisfaction Scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Acceptability was measured by the FACT satisfaction scale in the intervention group using the study-specific, 6-item FACT satisfaction scale. The total score range is 0-18 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction.
3 weeks
Acceptability as Measured by FACT Satisfaction Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Satisfaction with FACT will be measured in the intervention group using the study-specific, 6-item FACT satisfaction scale. Total score range is 0-18 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction.
6 weeks
Acceptability as Assessed by a Semi-structured, Post-intervention Interview
Time Frame: 6 weeks

Satisfaction with FACT will be assessed via semi-structured, post-intervention interviews.

Regarding n's, these interviews were offered as an optional part of participation among those randomized to the intervention (FACT). 12 participants agreed to participate in the interviews.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Participant Retention as Measured by Percentage of Participants Who Complete Survey
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Feasibility of participant retention as measured by the percentage of participants who complete at least one study survey, at the 3-week time point.
3 weeks
Change From Baseline Communication Self-efficacy Using the CSES
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks
Change in parental communication self-efficacy will be measured using an adapted version of the Communication Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES). The 9-item CSES measures parental communication self-efficacy on a visual analogue scale, with a total score range of 0 to 100, with higher scores meaning more self-efficacy.
Baseline, 3 weeks
Change From Baseline Communication Self-efficacy Using the CSES
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
Change in parental communication self-efficacy will be measured using an adapted version of the Communication Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES). The 9-item CSES measures parental communication self-efficacy on a visual analogue scale, with a total score range of 0 to 100, with higher scores meaning more self-efficacy.
Baseline, 6 weeks
Recruitment Feasibility as Measured by Rate of Eligible Patients Who Consent to Study Participation
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Percentage of approached patients who meet study eligibility criteria who enroll (provide informed consent) in the study.
6 weeks
Feasibility of Participant Retention as Measured by Percentage of Participants Who Complete Survey Assessments at 6 Weeks.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Percentage of enrolled participants who complete at least one study survey (any) at the 6-week time point.The number of participants who completed the assessment,
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zev M Nakamura, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LCCC2150
  • 5K07CA218167 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings