Efficacy and Safety in Transfusion Independent Non-severe Aplastic Anemia

September 9, 2025 updated by: Bing Han

A Randomized, Case Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency and Safety of Luspatercept Plus Cyclosporine Versus Cyclosporine in Newly Diagnosed Transfusion Independent Non-severe Aplastic Anemia (NSAA).

Aplastic anemia (AA) is a rare bone marrow failure disease characterized by bone marrow hypocellularity and peripheral blood pancytopenia. AA is divided into severe AA (SAA) and non-severe AA (NSAA) based on the degree of cytopenia. The first line therapy for SAA or transfusion dependent NSAA is either immunosuppression therapy (IST) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Little attention has been paid to patients with anemia but not transfusion dependent, whose quality of life is significantly impaired due to the anemia and other complications.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Recombined human erythropoietin (rhEPO) has been shown to increase the erythroid response and response rate when combined with IST for patients with newly diagnosed AA, either SAA or NSAA. Different from rhEPO, luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that binds to select transforming growth factor β superfamily ligands and enhances late-stage erythropoiesis, and has been shown the promising efficiency in the erythropoiesis in patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in the phase II and III clinical trials. This randomized control study aimed to compare the 6-month efficacy and safety of the combination of luspatercept and cyclosporine versus cyclosporine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed transfusion independent NSAA.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age≥18 year-old;
  2. hemoglobin level between 60g/L~10 g/dL;
  3. newly diagnosed patients have at least one of the followings: #absolute neutrophil count <1.5×109/L, #platelet count < 30×109/L, # hemoglobin level < 100g/L;
  4. with normal baseline liver and kidney function;
  5. with no active infection; are not pregnant or nursing;
  6. agree to sign consent forms;
  7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Congenital aplastic anemia;
  2. Presence of chromosomal aberration;
  3. Evidence of a clonal hematologic bone marrow disorder (MDS, AML) on cytogenetics;
  4. Presence with PNH clone ≥50%;
  5. Patients received HSCT before;
  6. Uncontrolled infection or bleeding with standard treatment;
  7. Allergic to luspatercept CsA or accessories;
  8. HIV, HCV or HBV active infection or liver cirrhosis or portal hypertension;
  9. Patient with QTcF (Fridericia's QT correction formula) at screening <450 msec, or<480 msec with bundle branch block, as determined via the mean of a triplicate ECG and assessed at site, unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled hypertension(>180/100mmHg)#pulmonary artery hypertension;
  10. Have any concomitant malignancies within 5 years expect for local basal cell carcinoma of the skin;
  11. Past history of thromboembolic event, heart attack or stroke (including anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome) and current use of anticoagulants;
  12. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) woman;
  13. Have attended other clinical trials within 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: efficiency and safety in luspatercept plus cyclosporine
luspatercept is at a dose of 1.0 mg per kilogram of body weight, administered subcutaneously every 3 weeks，and cyclosporine is at a dose of 3~5mg/kg /day for at least 6 months.
Drug: Luspatercept
Patients in each group will be treated for at least 6 months and continue the treatment for an additional 6 months unless disease progress or have intolerable side effects.
Other Names:
  • ciclosporin
Drug: Cyclosporine
Cyclosporine was administered at a 3-5 mg/(kd/d) and maintained at a 100-200 ng/ml trough plasma concentration.
Other Names:
  • Ciclosporin
  • Cyclosporin
Active Comparator: controll group in cyclosporine alone
cyclosporine is at a dose of 3~5mg/kg /day for at least 6 months.
Drug: Cyclosporine
Cyclosporine was administered at a 3-5 mg/(kd/d) and maintained at a 100-200 ng/ml trough plasma concentration.
Other Names:
  • Ciclosporin
  • Cyclosporin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 6 month
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Defined as the Number of Participants Who Met the Criteria of Either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR); HR defined as a hemoglobin increase from baseline of ≥1.5 g/dL for ≥2 weeks (in the absence of RBC transfusions)
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematologic response-erythroid（HR-E)
Time Frame: 6 month
HR is defined as a hemoglobin increase from baseline of ≥1.5 g/dL for ≥2 weeks (in the absence of RBC transfusions
6 month
side effects
Time Frame: 1 year
Safety analyses include assessments of the incidence and severity of adverse events; all adverse events that occurred or worsened during the treatment period will be reported, as well as adverse events that occurred later but are considered by the investigator to be related to the trial drug.
1 year
predictive factors
Time Frame: 6 month
Predictors analyses will evaluate the relationship between the effect of these two treatments with molecular mutations PIGA and BCOR and BCORL1 and EPO level.
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bing Han

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Bristol-Myers Squibb

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 9, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HanB-NSAA-lus

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

individual participant data would be accepted upon request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

10years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

email request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings