Natalizumab for the Treatment of People With Inflammatory Demyelination Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis, or Definite Multiple Sclerosis, at First Presentation (AttackMS) (AttackMS)

January 5, 2026 updated by: Queen Mary University of London

AttackMS: Natalizumab for the Treatment of People With Inflammatory Demyelination Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis, or Definite Multiple Sclerosis, at First Presentation

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory & degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) Recent data from the MS Base registry demonstrated an average delay of 152 - 215 days between first presentation and the diagnosis of MS, and more than one year until Disease Modifying Treatment (DMT) begins.

Evidence suggests that shutting down inflammation using highly effective DMTs early after diagnosis leads to better long term clinical outcomes The AttackMS trial will test the effect of starting a highly-effective DMT licensed for MS, Tyruko® (Natalizumab 300mg), within a short time - 14 days - after symptom onset.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

MS is a disease of the central nervous system affecting over 130,000 people in the UK and more than 2.8 million worldwide. Left untreated, MS leads to chronic disability in the large majority of cases.

CIS is a common first manifestation of MS: There is a more than 80% chance of MS in somebody presenting with CIS provided one or more "lesions" characteristic of inflammatory demyelination can be detected on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. The presence of at least two such lesions is an inclusion criterion for this study. Inflammatory demyelination is the process by which cells of your body's own immune system attack the insulation sheath (= myelin) of nerve fibres (= axons) in the central nervous system.

Once a diagnosis of MS has been confirmed, many people with this disease will be eligible for what is called "disease-modifying treatment" (DMT) on the NHS. Such treatment targets the immune cells that are involved in the inflammatory attack against the myelin sheaths and nerve fibres. However, while in a small number of cases, a diagnosis of MS can be made instantaneously it regularly takes week, months and, sometimes even longer, to fulfil the formal diagnostic criteria of MS. This diagnostic delay inevitably leads to delays in starting disease-modifying treatment.

Using a trial concept geared towards rapid assessment of eligibility, and a disease-modifying treatment that is both highly effective and generally well tolerated in people with MS, AttackMS will test whether:

(i) It is feasible to recruit participants with a diagnosis of CIS at high risk of MS, or definite MS, at first presentation for treatment within 14 days of symptom onset and (ii) Such early treatment improves myelin repair at 3 months, as measured using a special MRI technology called magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR).

Natalizumab (Tyruko®) is a medication currently approved by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) as a disease-modifying treatment for adults with rapidly evolving severe (RES) relapsing MS. We are looking to test safety and efficacy of treatment with Tyruko® 300mg, given through a needle in a vein (intravenous infusion), over 20 weeks and to advance mechanistic understanding in treating people with first presentation of CIS or MS.

AttackMS will test the effect of starting a highly-effective DMT licensed for MS, Tyruko®, within a short time - 14 days - after symptom onset. The main objective is to test Tyruko®, given intravenously every 4 weeks over 20 weeks, for safety, efficacy, and to advance the mechanistic understanding of the earliest events in inflammatory demyelination/MS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant has provided informed consent.
  2. Age 18-55 years
  3. Participant with CIS or MS at first presentation.
  4. Participants show two or more lesions on T2 weighted MRI suggestive of demyelination.
  5. Participant is willing and able to comply with clinical visits and procedures outlined in the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypersensitivity to Tyruko® or to any of the following excipients:

    • Histidine
    • Histidine monohydrochloride
    • Sodium chloride
    • Polysorbate 80 (E433)
    • Water for injections
  2. Evidence of multiple chronic demyelinating lesions on MRI without signs of recent activity.
  3. Participants with increased risk for opportunistic infections, including immunocompromised participants (those currently receiving immunosuppressive therapies or those immunocompromised by prior therapies).
  4. Combination with other Disease Modifying Treatments..
  5. Known active malignancies, except for participants with cutaneous basal cell carcinoma.
  6. Implants such as pacemaker, aneurysm clip in the brain and MRI-incompatible prosthetic heart valves.
  7. Significant comorbidities such as cardiac failure, renal failure, uncontrolled diabetes and uncontrolled hypercholesterolemia.
  8. History of stroke, thrombosis and/or myocardial infarction.
  9. Any other infection deemed, in the assessment of the PI or sub-investigator, clinically significant.
  10. Claustrophobia
  11. Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Tyruko® 300mg
Tyruko® 300mg, administered via intravenous infusion in a 4 week cycle, for a total of 6 cycles
Drug: Tyruko Injectable Product
Tyruko® is indicated as single disease modifying therapy in adults with highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Tyruko® 300mg concentrate for solution for infusion and matching placebo are collectively referred to as IMP when detailing to blinded trial procedures. Tyruko® 300mg will be colourless, clear to slightly opalescent solution.
Other Names:
  • Natalizumab
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo, administered via intravenous infusion in a 4 week cycle, for 3 cycles, followed by Tyruko® 300mg, administered via intravenous infusion for a total of 3 cycles
Drug: Placebo
Placebo is colourless, clear to slightly opalescent liquid. The formulation of the is the same as that of commercial Tyruko® minus the active ingredient. Placebo is in the same containers/vials as Tyruko®.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To establish whether there is efficacy superiority of Natalizumab (Tyruko®) over placebo at 12 weeks in facilitating remyelination of previously demyelinated CNS lesions, as measured by MRI lesion magnetization transfer ratio (MTR).
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Mean magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR) change in FLAIR-hyper-intense lesions at 12 weeks compared to baseline
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To establish whether there is a difference between participants receiving Natalizumab (Tyruko®) or placebo at 24 weeks in P100 latency measured using visually evoked potentials (VEP).
Time Frame: 0 and 24 weeks
P100 latency in each eye at week 24 compared to baseline. Inter-ocular P100 latency difference at week 24 compared to baseline.
0 and 24 weeks
To establish whether there is a difference between participants receiving Natalizumab (Tyruko®) or placebo at 24 weeks in number and occurrence of adverse events.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
To establish whether there is a difference between participants receiving Natalizumab (Tyruko®) or placebo at 24 weeks in facilitating remyelination of previously demyelinated CNS lesions using Magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR).
Time Frame: 0, 12 and/or 24 weeks
0, 12 and/or 24 weeks
To establish whether there is a difference between participants receiving Natalizumab (Tyruko®) or placebo at 24 weeks in protecting limb function.
Time Frame: 24 weeks

Serum-neurofilament light chain levels (SNfL) at week 24 compared to baseline. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at week 24 compared to baseline. SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test) score at week 24 compared to baseline. Lower Limb Function: The T25-FW (Timed 25 Foot Walk) will be collected in all pwMS. able to walk the required distance at week 24 compared to baseline.

9-HPT (Nine Hole Peg Test) at week 24 compared to baseline. NFI-MS (Neurological Fatigue Index-MS) score at week 24 compared to baseline 24 weeks.
24 weeks
To establish whether there is a difference between participants receiving Natalizumab (Tyruko®) or placebo at 24 weeks in Retinal nerve fibre layer ganglion cell + inner plexiform (GCIP) layer thickness measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Time Frame: O and 24 weeks
O and 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Queen Mary University of London

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Biogen
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Klaus Schmierer, Queen Mary University of London
  • Principal Investigator: Liqun Zhang, St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trusts
  • Principal Investigator: Victoria Singh-Curry, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1003822
  • 2021-002255-11 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD data collected on the trial will be uploaded to the Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit Safehaven and linked using pseudoanonymised participant IDs. Any further sharing of participant data to other researchers will be fully anonymised as specified at the time of participant consent.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings