Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Prospective Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Patient Groups Undergoing Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Erol Aydın, MD
- Phone Number: +905322546001
- Email: erolay@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
- Recruiting
- Istanbul Training and Research Hospital
-
Contact:
- Erol AYDIN, MD
- Phone Number: +90 5322546001
- Email: erolay@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical or/and radiological diagnosed primary inguinal hernia
- TEP or TAPP surgical methods
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recurrent hernias
- Patients with previous groin operations on same side
- Pregnant women
- Patients who did not accept to participate in the study
- ASA score of 3 or higher,
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Whole Mesh
For the patients in the first group, the whole patch will be laid on the area without being fixed.
|
TEP repair of inguinal hernias using either split or whole mesh
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Split Mesh
The patients in the second group will be given a patch of the same size, but partially divided horizontally and wrapped around the spermatic cord.
|
TEP repair of inguinal hernias using either split or whole mesh
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Carolinas Comfort Scale values
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Differences in postoperative pain and quality of life(Carolinas Comfort Scale at first month) in patients who use whole meshes and those who use split meshes.
|
6 month
|
|
Recurrence rates
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Differences in recurrence rates in patients who use whole meshes and those who use split meshes.
|
6 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recurrence rates
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Difference in recurrence rates at 6 months in patients who use whole meshes and those who use split meshes.
|
6 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 569874
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.