Complex Ocular Infection, Optimization of Microbiological Diagnosis (ICODIA)

September 8, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of different technique to optimize the microbiological diagnosis of the COI.

  • Metagenomic for the endophtalmitis
  • Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for corneal abscesses

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Microbiological diagnosis of complex ocular infection (COI) (i.e: endophtalmitis and corneal abscess) is a current challenge. Indeed, endophtalmitis are often germ-free because a lack of microbiological diagnosis due to small volume to analyze and a complex site to attain. The microbiological etiologies of corneal abscesses are more frequently identified.

Since few years, new molecular tools are developed in infectious diseases to optimizing the microbiological diagnosis. The investigators implemented these techniques in our hospital to optimize the microbiological diagnosis of complex ocular infection (COI). Thus, endophtalmitis benefit, when the volume of the ocular sample is sufficient, of molecular techniques (16s PCR and metagenomic shotgun). Corneal abscesses could shortly benefit of multiplex PCR in order to reduce the time to diagnosis.

The impact and accuracy of these techniques is unknown.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
153

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
    • IDF
      • Paris, IDF, France, 75014
        • Recruiting
        • Equipe mobile d'infectiologie, Cochin hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient presenting or having presented a clinical suspicion of complex ocular infection requiring a sample for microbiological diagnosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient

  • Patient presenting or having presented a clinical suspicion of complex ocular infection requiring a sample for microbiological diagnosis:

    • Corneal abscess requiring hospitalization
    • Any suspicion of endogenous or exogenous endophthalmitis.
  • Patient not opposed to participating in the research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Complex ocular infections (COI)
All patients with an COI (endophtalmitis or hospitalized keratitis)
Diagnostic test: NGS for endohtalmitis / Multiplex PCR for keratitis

For endophtalmitis : optimizing culture and NGS will be realized

For keratitis: Multiplex PCR will be added on ocular samples

Other Names:
  • Bundle of intervervention to optimizing diagnosis of ocular complex infections

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positivity rates of COI samples according to the new protocol
Time Frame: 2 weeks after taking samples

Before/after type comparison. Comparison of the positivity rates of COI samples according to the new protocol: (i) for endophthalmitis performing a vitreous puncture (PV) or an anterior chamber puncture (PCA), or corneal scraping, optimized with modification of microbiological techniques (culture on enriched medium alone associated with shotgun metagenomics), (ii) for severe corneal abscesses, addition to standard microbiological techniques of molecular biology tests (multiplex PCR and / or metagenomics).

An COI will be considered with a positive microbiological diagnosis after multidisciplinary concertation considering the different results
2 weeks after taking samples

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbiological diagnosis of the infection
Time Frame: At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Analysis of a prospective cohort of COI
At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Time to microbiological diagnosis according to the different technic
Time Frame: At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Analysis of a prospective cohort of COI
At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Accuracy of the different technics according to the gold standard (microbiological culture)
Time Frame: At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Analysis of a prospective cohort of COI
At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Visual acuity
Time Frame: At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Evaluation of visual acuity at the end of treatment and the cure rate. The investigators hypothesized that the improvement of the microbiological diagnosis allows an improvement of the therapeutic management and thus of the visual outcome.
At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Cure rate
Time Frame: At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Evaluation of visual acuity at the end of treatment and the cure rate. The investigators hypothesized that the improvement of the microbiological diagnosis allows an improvement of the therapeutic management and thus of the visual outcome.
At the end of the follow up: 18 months
Modification or not of the anti-infectious treatment
Time Frame: At the end of the follow up: 18 months

Analysis of the impact of microbiological diagnosis on the choice of anti-infectious molecules..

The investigators hypothesized that the improvement of the microbiological diagnosis and the implementation of the COI management bundle will induce a modification of the prescription of anti-infectious molecules. The investigators will realize a qualitative and quantitative analysis of prescribed anti-infective molecules
At the end of the follow up: 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
URC Necker Cochin, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Etienne CANOUI, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 17, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 8, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • APHP220259
  • 2021-A02587-34 (Other Identifier: France : ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings