A RCT of UBE vs. MIS-TLIF in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Versus MIS-TLIF in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Zhi-wei WANG, Ph.D and MD.
- Phone Number: 0571-87783759
- Email: keyanlunli_zheer@163.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Lumbar spondylolisthesis,
- 40 yrs<age< 75yrs
- fusion levels <2
Exclusion Criteria:
- greater than Lenke-slivia classification III
- severe osteoporosis (t value <2.5)
- ASA 》IV
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: UBE
The patient treated with unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)
|
There are two surgical treatments for lumbar spondylolisthesis; one is UBE, and another is MIS-TLIF
|
|
Active Comparator: MIS-TLIF
The patient treated with classical minimally invasive posterior spinal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)
|
There are two surgical treatments for lumbar spondylolisthesis; one is UBE, and another is MIS-TLIF
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ODI score
Time Frame: 2 year postoperatively
|
the D-value between the preoperative ODI score and 2-year-postoperative ODI score
|
2 year postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gang CHEN, MD., 2nd hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- MUTCH J, WALMSLEY R. The aetiology of cleft vertebral arch in spondylolisthesis. Lancet. 1956 Jan 14;270(6907):74-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(56)92130-4. No abstract available.
- Oster BA, Kikanloo SR, Levine NL, Lian J, Cho W. Systematic Review of Outcomes Following 10-Year Mark of Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jun 15;45(12):820-824. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003485.
- Kwon JW, Park Y, Lee BH, Yoon SR, Ha JW, Kim H, Suk KS, Moon SH, Kim HS, Lee HM. Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):773-780. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004334. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
- Park SM, Park J, Jang HS, Heo YW, Han H, Kim HJ, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS. Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
- Lightsey HM 4th, Pisano AJ, Striano BM, Crawford AM, Xiong GX, Hershman S, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. ALIF Versus TLIF for L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-reported Outcome Measures Domains. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):808-816. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004333. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
- Heo DH, Lee DC, Park CK. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
Helpful Links
- Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis
- ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-reported Outcome Measures
- Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UBE vs. MIS-TLIF
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.