Treatment of Angina Pectoris After Coronary Revascularization With Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
Evidence-based Optimization of Chinese and Western Medicine Differentiation and Treatment Scheme for Angina Pectoris After Coronary Revascularization
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study was to observe whether the combination of traditional Chinese medicine intervention on the basis of standardized western medicine treatment could further reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with angina pectoris after coronary revascularization compared with western medicine treatment, and to conduct objective follow-up. Evaluation of integrated Chinese and Western medicine interventions. Clinical efficacy of angina pectoris after coronary revascularization and characteristic advantages of TCM syndrome improvement.
The trial is a multicenter, prospective clinical cohort study design. It is expected that 2,000 subjects will be included, and they will be divided into 4 groups according to whether they receive Chinese medicine treatment and the degree of exposure to Chinese medicine. One group received only western medicine basic treatment, and the other three groups received Chinese medicine treatment combined with western medicine basic treatment (the difference was that the cumulative treatment time of Chinese medicine reached 80%, 30%-79% or 30% of the total course of treatment, respectively). Among them, Chinese medicines (including Chinese patent medicines, Chinese medicine decoctions, Chinese medicine granules, and Chinese medicine injections) have been used and/or taken for 5 months in total.
The duration of treatment (including follow-up) in this trial was 24 months. Study data were recorded at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Liaoning
-
Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110000
- Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
①Age ≥18 years old and ≤85 years old;
Patients who have undergone coronary revascularization (including coronary bypass and/or PCI) in the past.
- Those who participated voluntarily and signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
①Incomplete case data, unable to provide original surgical data entry;
Patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for coronary heart disease, angina pectoris or myocardial infarction, but have not undergone coronary revascularization or failed surgery;
Patients who still need continuous mechanical adjuvant therapy after successful coronary revascularization; ④ Combined with other heart diseases, such as malignant arrhythmia (rapid atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia), or cardiac insufficiency before and after surgery (cardiac function class IV, NYHA class or Killip class), severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency .
- Those who have a history of hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident, or a history of ischemic cerebrovascular accident (including TIA) within half a year; ⑥Mental patients or those who may not be able to cooperate with the program requirements and follow-up procedures due to educational level, language barriers and other reasons.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Control
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Strong exposure group of traditional Chinese medicine
receiving traditional Chinese medicine treatment + basic western medicine treatment, the cumulative time of traditional Chinese medicine treatment reaches more than 80% of the total course of treatment
|
The cumulative observation and treatment (including Chinese patent medicine, Chinese medicine decoction, Chinese medicine granule, Chinese medicine injection, and western medicine) were more than 5 months, and the follow-up was 1.5 years.
|
|
Moderate Chinese medicine exposure group
received Chinese medicine treatment + western medicine basic treatment, the cumulative time of Chinese medicine treatment reached 30%-79% of the total course of treatment
|
The cumulative observation and treatment (including Chinese patent medicine, Chinese medicine decoction, Chinese medicine granule, Chinese medicine injection, and western medicine) were more than 5 months, and the follow-up was 1.5 years.
|
|
Weak exposure group of traditional Chinese medicine
receiving traditional Chinese medicine treatment + basic western medicine treatment, the cumulative time of traditional Chinese medicine treatment is less than 30% of the total course of treatment
|
The cumulative observation and treatment (including Chinese patent medicine, Chinese medicine decoction, Chinese medicine granule, Chinese medicine injection, and western medicine) were more than 5 months, and the follow-up was 1.5 years.
|
|
Western medicine group
receive basic western medicine treatment only
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of MACE
Time Frame: Assess once 24 months after taking medicine
|
Major adverse cardiovascular events that may have occurred in subjects were recorded throughout the trial,and assessed 24 months after taking medicine.
|
Assess once 24 months after taking medicine
|
|
Readmission rate
Time Frame: Assess once 24 months after taking medicine
|
Readmissions for cardiovascular disease were recorded throughout the trial,and assessed 24 months after taking medicine.
|
Assess once 24 months after taking medicine
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Angina attack frequency scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Subjects were assessed using the Angina attack frequency scale at months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6.
Higher scores indicate worse subjects.
|
3 months
|
|
Angina Attack Duration scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Subjects were assessed using the Angina Attack Duration scale at months3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6.
Higher scores indicate worse subjects.
|
3 months
|
|
Angina Pain scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Subjects were assessed using the Angina Pain scale at months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6.
Higher scores indicate worse subjects.
|
3 months
|
|
Nitroglycerin Dosage scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Subjects were assessed using the Nitroglycerin Dosage scale at months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6.
Higher scores indicate worse subjects.
|
3 months
|
|
The Seattle angina questionaire
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Subjects were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at months 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24.
The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores indicate better subjects.
|
3 months
|
|
NYHA classification
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Subjects were assessed at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months using NYHA classification.
Results include grades I, II, III, and IV.Higher Class indicate worse subjects.
|
3 months
|
|
Traditional Chinese medicine syndrome rating scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
On the 0th, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st, and 24th months, the subjects were evaluated using the TCM syndrome score table, and the evaluation results were judged as markedly effective, effective, ineffective or aggravated.
|
3 months
|
|
Patient Health Questionaire-9 scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
On the 0th, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st, and 24th months,Subjects were assessed using the Patient Health Questionaire-9 scale with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 27.
Higher scores indicate worse subjects.
|
3 months
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder -7 scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
On the 0th, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st, and 24th months,Subjects were assessed using theGeneralized Anxiety Disorder -7 scale with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 21.
Higher scores indicate worse subjects.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shuai Wang, master, Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 002-20190701
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.