Evaluation of the Alife Hera System as an Adjunctive Tool for the Prioritization of Embryos Deemed Suitable for Transfer (LOTUS)
Evaluation of the Alife Hera System as an Adjunctive Tool for the Prioritization of Embryos Deemed Suitable for Transfer: A Randomized Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
To evaluate the clinical pregnancy rate (pregnancy defined as fetal heartbeat at 6-8 weeks) with the adjunctive use of the Hera System (Hera System used with traditional morphological grading) with embryos already deemed suitable for transfer compared to trained embryologists using standard morphology criteria alone.
To evaluate the performance and utilization of the Hera System as an adjunctive embryo grading and prioritization tool in an embryology lab setting with trained embryologists.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Vaishali Suraj, MS
- Phone Number: 4088913321
- Email: vsuraj@alifehealth.com
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Menlo Park, California, United States, 94025
- CCRM
-
San Ramon, California, United States, 94583
- Reproductive Science Center
-
-
Florida
-
Margate, Florida, United States, 33063
- IVF Florida Reproductive Associates
-
Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32789
- Center for Reproductive Medicine
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
- Ovation Fertility
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78258
- Aspire Fertility
-
-
Utah
-
Sandy City, Utah, United States, 84092
- Reproductive Care Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- >21 and < 43 years of age
- Women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment using their own eggs
- At least 8 eggs retrieved
- Fertilization using only ejaculated sperm including donor sperm (fresh or frozen)
- Single embryo transfer (SET)
- Willing to comply with study protocol and procedures and be able to speak English
- Willing to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Gestational carriers
- Use of re-inseminated eggs
- Use of donor eggs
- History of cancer
- Fertilization using surgically removed sperm
- Transfer of multiple (more than one) embryos at once
- Participants undergoing IVF with intent to bank embryos (i.e. no intention of embryo transfer for at least 6 months following egg retrieval)
- Concurrent participation in another clinical study that might interfere with the study results in either study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Traditional Morphology
The embryo selection will be based on standard of care traditional morphology only.
|
|
|
Experimental: Device: Hera System
For the Hera, the embryologist will use the consider both the standard morphology grade and the Hera System score on embryos that were already deemed suitable for transfer or freeze based on the standard morphology assessment to determine the most suitable embryo for transfer.
|
The device uses patient metadata (patient age, day of image capture) and a software algorithm to analyze features of the blastocyst morphology to provide adjunctive information that may predict further development of the embryo to clinical pregnancy after embryo transfer.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Endpoint
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks
|
The primary study endpoint is clinical pregnancy - defined as a fetal heartbeat at 6-8 weeks.
|
up to 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of disagreement
Time Frame: week 1
|
Incidence of disagreement for the top-ranked embryo between the Hera System and the embryologist.
|
week 1
|
|
User Experience
Time Frame: through study completion at 8 weeks
|
Assessment of Hera System usability as reported by the embryologist using a user questionnaire.
|
through study completion at 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CIP-01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.