Spinal Stimulation and Mobility Devices
Transcutaneous Stimulation and Mobility Device Use for Individuals With Neurologic Conditions
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
For people with neurological conditions, excessive and inappropriate muscle activity resulting from injured sensory pathways (e.g., spasticity or hypertonicity) contributes to inefficient movement, bone deformities, pain, and other comorbidities. Research with humans and animals have highlighted the critical importance of both motor and sensory pathways for motor learning after neurologic injury. However, the best techniques for engaging motor and sensory pathways in a way that brings high quality mobility are not well understood. With this study we will examinee how increased sensory feedback, through mobility device use and electrical spinal stimulation, impact movement mechanics in people with neurological conditions to inform long-term studies and eventual implementation into clinical practice.
Mobility devices offer a promising approach to improve mobility rehabilitation through engagement of sensory and motor pathways. These devices can either assist in movement by providing support to perform an activity or they can be used to provide resistance to build strength. Mechanistically how these devices impact movement mechanics is still not well understood.
Electrical spinal stimulation with intensive, repetitive training has demonstrated exciting potential to improve limb function after neurologic injury. Spinal stimulation has shown to improve motor function with long-term training. Stimulation is hypothesized to improve motor pathways through boosting sensory input. However, the neuromechanical effects of stimulation as a result of increased sensory feedback over an acute time frame has not been explored in efforts to test this hypothesis.
This study aims to evaluate the acute effects of increased afferent feedback in individuals with neurological conditions via mobility devices and spinal stimulation. Understanding how these approaches affect the quantity and quality of movement in the short term is a first step before determining potential treatment outcomes. In this research, we will quantify the neuromechanics of movement with and without these approaches for individuals with neurologic disorders.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Katherine Steele, PHD
- Phone Number: 206-685-2390
- Email: kmsteele@uw.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Katie Landwehr, MS
- Phone Number: 937-231-1205
- Email: klandweh@uw.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
- Recruiting
- University of Washington
-
Contact:
- Katie Landwehr, MS
- Phone Number: 937-231-1205
- Email: klandweh@uw.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- have a neurologic condition
- are 4-70 years of age
- have stable medical condition
- can perform simple cued motor tasks and who can follow 2-3 step commands
- who are volunteering to be involved in this study
- can provide feedback on comfort and experience during lab visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- have significant medical disease; including uncontrolled systemic hypertension with values above 170/100 mmHg; cardiac or pulmonary disease; uncorrected coagulation abnormalities or need for therapeutic anticoagulation.
- have cardiovascular or musculoskeletal disease or injury that would prevent full participation in physical therapy intervention
- have a history of uncontrolled seizures
- have unhealed fracture or other musculoskeletal impairment that might interfere with lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
- are dependent on ventilation support
- have implanted stimulator (e.g. epidural stimulator, vagus nerve stimulator, pacemaker, cochlear implant, etc) or drug delivery device (e.g. baclofen pump)
- have history of orthopedic surgery in lower extremities or neurosurgery that may be a confounding factor for interpretation of the results (such as tendon transfer, tendon or muscle lengthening for spasticity management, injection therapies to lower extremity muscles, etc.) in last 12 months
- have established osteoporosis and taking medication for osteoporosis treatment.
- have rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.)
- have active cancer
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Neurologic Disorders
Evaluation of individual and combined effects of mobility devices and spinal stimulation for individuals with neurologic disorders.
|
Use of mobility device during session.
Other Names:
A stimulator will be used non-invasively stimulate the spine at the neck and/or lower back (cervical and/or lum
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Muscle Coordination
Time Frame: Comparing first and last minute of walking on treadmill at each experimental session.
|
Change in level of co-contraction between the plantarflexor and tibialis anterior muscles during the gait cycle monitored from electromyography recordings.
|
Comparing first and last minute of walking on treadmill at each experimental session.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Physical exam conducted at the beginning and end of each experimental session.
|
Change in summed score of spasticity from lower-extremity muscles.
Lower values indicate less spasticity.
|
Physical exam conducted at the beginning and end of each experimental session.
|
|
Plantarflexor Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Physical exam conducted at the beginning and end of experimental session.
|
Change in maximum voluntary contraction level of the plantarflexor muscles taken as the average of three trials where the participant exerts the maximum amount of force measured from a handheld dynamometer with verbal encouragement.
|
Physical exam conducted at the beginning and end of experimental session.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Katherine Steele, PhD, University of Washington
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Obstetric Labor, Premature
- Obstetric Labor Complications
- Pregnancy Complications
- Infant, Premature, Diseases
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases
- Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
- Brain Damage, Chronic
- Hypoxia, Brain
- Hypoxia
- Encephalomalacia
- Premature Birth
- Cerebral Palsy
- Brain Diseases
- Brain Ischemia
- Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain
- Leukomalacia, Periventricular
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00014877
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.