Beta-glucan and Fatigue in HSCT Survivors

October 20, 2023 updated by: University of Florida

Yeast-derived Beta-glucan Supplementation for Fatigue Symptoms in Autologous Haemopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors

This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study exploring the effects of a yeast-derived β-glucan on clinically significant fatigue among survivors of autologous HCT due to multiple myeloma. The primary aim is to evaluate the effect of β-glucan supplementation on changes in fatigue symptoms, as assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) global fatigue score, by testing the differences in changes in scores from baseline to the mid-point (mean of weeks 1-4) and to the end of the intervention (mean of weeks 5-8).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Fatigue is one of the most prevalent and distressing complications among hematopoietic cell transplantation HCT survivors, affecting up to 80% of patients. Fatigue has a significant negative impact on the physical, functional, social, and emotional domains of quality of life. Therefore, special attention should be directed toward therapeutic interventions in reducing persistent fatigue, which in turn improves quality of life of this patient population. Research is needed to determine if yeast-derived β-glucan regulates inflammatory disruption and fatigue in patient populations. This study will investigate the efficacy of β-glucan supplementation on fatigue symptoms in autologous HCT survivors due to multiple myeloma. The primary aim is to evaluate the effect of β-glucan supplementation on changes in fatigue symptoms, as assessed by the BFI global fatigue score, by testing the differences in changes in scores from baseline to the mid-point (mean of weeks 1-4) and to the end of the intervention (mean of weeks 5-8). Secondary objectives will be to evaluate tolerability, adverse events, inflammatory cytokines, quality of life, sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, and depression.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Wendy J Dahl, PhD
  • Phone Number: 3522943707
  • Email: wdahl@ufl.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • Shands at University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Be an autologous HSCT survivor with clinically significant fatigue (determined post-consent). Clinically significant fatigue is defined as BFI global score greater than 3.0.
  • Have a medical history of the first autologous HSCT due to multiple myeloma approximately 30 days before starting the study intervention.
  • Be willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Be willing and able to comply with all the study-related procedures, including attending study visits for the blood draws, intake of the study supplement, and completing study questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have an active infection.
  • Have disease relapse.
  • Have absolute neutrophil count less than 500.
  • Have anemia and thrombocytopenia requiring transfusions.
  • Have an untreated medical condition that could clinically explain fatigue in this population (i.e., untreated hypothyroidism).
  • Have begun to take antidepressants less than 30 days from enrollment.
  • Demonstrate an inability to comply with the study and/or follow-up procedures.
  • Use probiotic supplements. The subjects can participate if they are willing to stop taking probiotics. A one-month withdrawal from probiotics is required

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Beta-glucan
500 mg/d of beta-glucan
Dietary supplement: Beta-glucan
2, 250 mg capsules of beta-glucan per day
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
500 mg/d of cellulose
Dietary supplement: Placebo
2, 250 mg capsules of cellulose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fatigue as assessed by Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) tool
Time Frame: 8 weeks
change in global fatigue score
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of adverse events per group
Time Frame: 8 weeks
number of adverse events
8 weeks
Change in serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFN-γ
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Inflammatory cytokines
8 weeks
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone MarrowTransplantation (FACT-BMT) score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Assessment of Quality of Life
8 weeks
Change in General Sleep Disturbances Scale (GSDS) score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Assessment of sleep disturbance
8 weeks
Change in Global07, from PROMIS® Numeric Rating Scale v.1.0 - Pain Intensity 1a plus PAININ20, from PROMIS - Ca Item Bank v1.1 - Pain Interference score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Assessment of pain
8 weeks
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Assessment of mood including anxiety and depression.
8 weeks
Change in the Godin Leisure Form (GLF) score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Assessment of physical activity
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Lallemand Bio-Ingredients

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nosha Farhadfar, MD, University of Florida
  • Principal Investigator: Wendy Dahl, PhD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB202102622

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Not yet determined.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings