Effectiveness Evaluation of the Digital Workflow for Single-implant Immediate Loading
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Han-Jen Hsu, PhD
- Phone Number: +886 922909330
- Email: d80.wu63@msa.hinet.net
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 20 to 80 years old
- Miss two functional opposing teeth in one quadrant or the same jaw
- The situation of oral tissue satisfies the condition of implant immediate loading.
Exclusion Criteria:
- catastrophic illness,
- diabetes,
- cardiovascular diseases,
- osteoporosis,
- head and neck cancer,
- disabled
- pregnant.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
dynamic navigation group or static guide group
Every patient has 2 missing in one jaw The missing tooth will be restored with one-visit single implant immediate loading. One implant placed is assisted with dynamic navigation system, and the other one is assisted with static surgical guide. |
One implant placement is assisted with x-guide dynamic navigation system.
The other implant placement is assisted with static surgical guide
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Record visiting time
Time Frame: during procedure
|
Record the time (minutes) in every clinical procedure
|
during procedure
|
|
Implant success rate
Time Frame: Change in periapical film of the implant on post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
No osteointegration of implant
|
Change in periapical film of the implant on post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
|
Prosthesis success rate
Time Frame: Change in photo on post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
Morphology of the restoration
|
Change in photo on post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
|
surgical complications
Time Frame: Post operation 1 week
|
pain, swelling, infection after surgery
|
Post operation 1 week
|
|
prosthetic success rates
Time Frame: Change in post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
final pink aesthetic score
|
Change in post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
|
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Time Frame: Change in post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
implant stability
|
Change in post operation immediately, post operation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Type of incision
Time Frame: during the operation
|
flap or flapless
|
during the operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
- Emery RW, Merritt SA, Lank K, Gibbs JD. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation. J Oral Implantol. 2016 Oct;42(5):399-405. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
- Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Carosi P, Nardi A, Kan J. Clinical and radiological outcomes of novel digital workflow and dynamic navigation for single-implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone: 1-year prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Dec;32(12):1397-1410. doi: 10.1111/clr.13839. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
- Lopes A, de Araujo Nobre M, Santos D. The Workflow of a New Dynamic Navigation System for the Insertion of Dental Implants in the Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: Report of Two Cases. J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 4;9(2):421. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020421.
- Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, Ryan J. Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):92-99. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5004. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
- Dure M, Berlinghoff F, Kollmuss M, Hickel R, Huth KC. First comparison of a new dynamic navigation system and surgical guides for implantology: an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Feb 26;24(1):9-17.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KMUHIRB-F(II)-20220117
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.