Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Genicular Radiofrequency
Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ankara
-
Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey, 06170
- Recruiting
- Health Science University Diskapi Yildirim Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intra-articular injections in the knee during the 3 months prior to procedure
- Chronic pain syndrome
- Lumbar radicular pain
- Patients who are unwilling or mentally incapable to complete the study questionnaires.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Perpendicular Group
Perpendicular genicular radiofrequency application
|
Radiofrequency ablation was applied to the perpendicular group by placing the tip of electrode perpendicularly to contact the genicular nerves.
|
|
Active Comparator: Parallel Group
Parallel genicular radiofrequency application
|
Radiofrequency ablation was applied to the parallel group by placing the electrode lay parallel to contact the genicular nerves.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention.
|
The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10).The lower the score, the least pain the patient experiences.
|
6 months after intervention.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention.
|
WOMAC is a 24-item scale under the headings of pain, stiffness and functional activity.
Patients rate the amount of strain, pain felt, and joint stiffness during daily activities between 0 and 4 (0 is the best, 4 is the worst), and the total score is between 0 and 96.
|
6 months after intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 139/27
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.