Evaluation of Autogenous Stored Versus Autogenous Fresh Mineralized Dentin Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Clinical, Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Autogenous Stored Versus Autogenous Fresh Mineralized Dentin Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Tooth extraction triggers a cascade of biological events mediated by both the local inflammatory response that follows the surgical intervention and the deprivation of masticatory stimulation of the periodontium, which elicit an alteration of the homoeostasis and structural integrity of the periodontal tissues. Bone remodeling kicks off after tooth loss and continues for several months with most changes taking place in the first three months.
Interestingly, Schmidt-Schultz and Schultz, found that intact growth factors are conserved even in the collagenous extracellular matrix of ancient human bone and teeth. Thus, the application of stored dentin may have similar benefits as fresh dentin, preserving intact growth factors for a prolonged period avoiding the need to perform multiple surgical interventions simultaneously. The volume of the particulate dentin is more than twice of the original root volume. Thus, the idea of using autogenous stored mineralized dentin grafts (ASMDG) in ARP evolved.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Immediately following tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge comes across its normal physiologic healing process that results in respective alveolar bone loss, structural and compositional changes of the covering soft tissues, as well as morphological alterations.
In an attempt to cutback horizontal and vertical ridge losses, various techniques have been successfully proven to preserve the alveolar ridge including autografts, allografts, xenografts, alloplasts and autogenous dentin grafts. However, fresh autogenous bone graft is still considered gold standard since it exhibits bioactive cell instructive matrix properties and is non-immunogenic and non - pathogenic in spite of the need for harvesting bone and possible morbidity resulting from it. Nevertheless, no gold-standard technique is applicable for every clinical situation.
The similarities between dentin and alveolar bone may help the human body to show an acceptable biological behavior to dentin graft. It is therefore not surprising that dentin that comprises more than 85% of tooth structure can serve as a native bone grafting material, which is reflected by the interaction between mineralized dentin and osteogenic cells that attach and produce mineralized bone matrix directly on the dentin graft.
Mineralized dentin particles have the advantage to maintain its mechanical stability, allowing early loading after grafting in fresh sockets and bone defects where the mineralized dentin is firmly integrated with newly formed bone, creating a solid site for anchorage of dental implants.
Fresh ground dentin has been used successfully as a grafting material alternative in alveolar ridge preservation which has been manifested in that the clinically grafted sites demonstrated limited ridge resorption which allowed for subsequent implant placement without the need to use additional graft biomaterials.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Nada Wahsh, Bachelor
- Phone Number: 01026191091
- Email: nada.wahsh@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Potential candidates requiring extraction of maxillary non-molar teeth.
- Periodontally healthy adjacent teeth.
- Extraction sockets having no more than 50% of buccal alveolar bone loss
Exclusion Criteria:
- Smokers.
- Patients reporting systemic conditions that may compromise healing or bone metabolism (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, hyperthyroidism).
- Patients having a history of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or bisphosphonate therapy.
- Females who were pregnant or planning to get pregnant during the study course.
- Root canal treated teeth and teeth with acute infection at the site of extraction
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Autogenous stored mineralized dentin graft (ASMDG)
Autogenous stored mineralized dentin graft (ASMDG) particles will be prepared by immersing tooth particles in basic ethanol for 10 min for disinfection, then washed twice in saline and dried using sterile gauze The disinfected particles will then be stored at room temperature for 21 days in a sterile container.
After 21 days, a second extraction will be performed followed by mixing the stored graft with a few drops of sterile saline to be packed in a socket after extraction
|
Autogenous stored mineralized dentin graft (ASMDG) particles will be prepared by immersing tooth particles in basic ethanol for 10 min for disinfection, then washed twice in saline and dried using sterile gauze. The disinfected particles will then be stored at room temperature for 21 days in a sterile container. After 21 days, a second extraction will be performed followed by mixing the stored graft with a few drops of sterile saline to be packed in a socket after extraction |
|
Active Comparator: Autogenous fresh mineralized dentin graft (AFMDG)
Autogenous fresh mineralized dentin graft (AFMDG) particles will be prepared by immersing tooth particles in basic ethanol for 10 min for disinfection, then washed twice in saline and dried using sterile gauze
|
Autogenous fresh mineralized dentin graft (AFMDG) particles will be prepared by immersing tooth particles in basic ethanol for 10 min for disinfection, then washed twice in saline and dried using sterile gauze.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in buccolingual horizontal alveolar ridge width
Time Frame: 4 months
|
The horizontal buccolingual alveolar ridge width will be measured radiographically on a CBCT at three levels: at -1 mm, -3 mm, -5 mm below the most coronal aspect of the crest (HW-1, HW-3, HW-5), and clinically by a caliper at -3 mm and -5 mm (HW-3 and HW-5).
Measurements will be taken at baseline and after 4 months postoperatively to calculate the change.
|
4 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Alveolar buccal ridge height
Time Frame: 4 months
|
The alveolar buccal ridge height will be measured radiographically on a CBCT at baseline and after 4 months postoperatively.
|
4 months
|
|
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with numbers from 0 to 10 ('no pain' to 'worst pain imaginable')
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:195-223. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13057. Erratum In: J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jan;47(1):129.
- Schmidt-Schultz TH, Schultz M. Intact growth factors are conserved in the extracellular matrix of ancient human bone and teeth: a storehouse for the study of human evolution in health and disease. Biol Chem. 2005 Aug;386(8):767-76.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ARPerio22
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.