Comparison Between Splint and Laser in Patients Without Disc Displacement With Reduction
Comparison Between the Efficacy of Stabilization Splint and Low Level Laser Therapy for Treatment of Patients With Chronic Closed Lock of the Non-reducible Temporo-mandibular Joint Disc. A Parallel Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Objectives: Stabilization splint therapy and low- level laser therapy may serve as non-invasive intervention for painful temporomandibular disorders, but its efficacy is still debated. This study compared the effect of stabilization splint and low- level laser therapy alone or in combination in patients with painful chronic closed lock of temporomandibular joints disc displacement without Reduction.
Patients and methods: 42 patients diagnosed with chronic closed lock of disc displacement without reduction were allocated equally and randomly into three treatment groups: group I received combined stabilization splint and low-level laser therapy, group II received low-level laser therapy and group III received stabilization splint. They were evaluated at baseline and one week, two weeks, four weeks, three months, and six months after the intervention. Time of being normal was also evaluated.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mansoura, Egypt
- Mansoura University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of chronic closed lock patients
- Must not be able to open their mouth
Exclusion Criteria:
- neurologic diseases
- TMJ pathologic lesions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: stabilization splint
acrylic splint in the maxillary arch with flat surface
|
upper acrylic splint rest on the maxillary teeth and had flat surface
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: laser therapy
laser beam directed to the affected part cause activation of blood circulation
|
The laser apparatus had a hand piece on which either a specially designed optic prism was attached to transfer laser energy to the tip of the prism
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: stabilization splint and laser therapy
using both laser therapy and stabilization splint for more improvement
|
the stabilization splint used in combination of treatment with laser therapy
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
evaluation of mouth opening
Time Frame: 6 months
|
improvement in mouth opening or not
|
6 months
|
|
Masticatory muscles palpation
Time Frame: 6 months
|
the masticatory muscles were palpated bilaterally with firm and constant pressure of one kg lasted two seconds to define painful areas
|
6 months
|
|
temporomandibular joint palpation
Time Frame: 6 months
|
joint pain was achieved by first palpating the temporomandibular joint lateral pole by placing the index finger with firm and constant pressure of half kg lasted two seconds over the condyle in front of the tragus |
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Noha Elshahid, lecturer at mansoura university prosthodontic department
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ooi K, Yura S, Inoue N, Totsuka Y. Factors related to the incidence of anterior disc displacement without reduction and bony changes of the temporomandibular joint in patients with anterior open bite. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;18(4):397-401. doi: 10.1007/s10006-013-0424-3. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
- Samdal F, Amland PF, Sandsmark M, Hall C, Aasen AO. Suction-assisted lipectomy does not increase the risk of random flap necrosis in a randomized study in pigs. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995 Nov-Dec;19(6):549-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00454320.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- A34080622
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.