Diagnostic Performance of General Practitioners in Compression UltraSound (GPCUS)

September 19, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Caen

Diagnostic Performance of General Practitioners in Compression Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Limbs

The objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of general practitioners for the diagnosis of proximal deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs compared with whole-leg ultrasound with Doppler performed by the vascular physician.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

After being informed about the study and the potential risks, all patients who have given their written consent and who meet the eligibility criteria will benefit from a 3-point compression ultrasound performed by the general practitioner before being referred for a whole-leg ultrasound with Doppler at the vascular physician.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Avranches, France, 50300
        • Avranches
      • Bain-de-Bretagne, France, 35470
        • Bain de Bretagne
      • Colombelles, France, 14460
        • Colombelles
      • Condé sur vire, France, 50890
        • Condé sur vire
      • Honfleur, France, 14600
        • Honfleur
      • Ifs, France, 14123
        • Ifs
      • Le Chesnay, France, 78150
        • Le Chesnay
      • Le Pont de Montvert, France, 48220
        • Le pont de montvert
      • Lons-le-Saunier, France, 39000
        • Lons-le-Saunier
      • Molay, France, 14330
        • Le Molay Littry
      • Ouistreham, France, 14150
        • Ouistreham
      • Paris, France, 75017
        • Paris rue de Rome
      • Percy, France, 50410
        • Percy
      • Ploerdut, France, 56160
        • Ploerdut
      • Potigny, France, 14420
        • Potigny
      • Sannerville, France, 14940
        • Sannerville
      • Saïx, France, 81710
        • Saix
      • Troarn, France, 14670
        • Troarn
    • Normandie
      • Bayeux, Normandie, France, 14400
        • Bayeux

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 110 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years
  • Management by a general practitioner trained in 3-point venous ultrasound
  • Suspicion of deep vein thrombosis by the general practitioner with prescription of a whole-leg Doppler ultrasound by a vascular physician. It is noted that the patient can be included from the moment the general practitioner had planned to refer the patient to the vascular physician for a suspicion of DVT, including in the absence of realization of DDimer on a low probability of DVT. It may also be included in case of positive DDimer tests.
  • Signed written consent
  • Patient covered by the French social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Whole leg ultrasound performed more than 72 hours after the initial examination
  • History of homolateral deep vein thrombosis
  • Patient objecting to the use of his data
  • Refusal of written and signed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: compression ultrasound
All patients receive a 3-point compression ultrasound followed within 72 hours by a whole-leg ultrasound with Doppler performed by a vascular physician.
Diagnostic test: Compression ultrasound
Patients receive a 3-point compression ultrasound performed by the general practitioner to look for proximal deep vein thrombosis.
Other Names:
  • three-point compression
  • three-point compression ultrasound
  • three-point point-of-care ultrasound technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of 3 point venous compression
Time Frame: 72 hours
The diagnostic performance (Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value) of 3-point venous compression ultrasound performed by general practitioners for the diagnosis of proximal venous thrombosis of the lower limbs compared to the usual recommended examination (whole leg ultrasound by a vascular physician)
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The evaluation of the feasibility of venous compression ultrasound in the office by the general practitioner.
Time Frame: 72 hours

For each patient, the general practitioner must say whether or not he or she was successful in performing the compression ultrasound.

The measure will be the percentage of ultrasound examinations considered successful by general practitioners.
72 hours
Duration of the ultrasound performed by the general practitioner in minutes.
Time Frame: 72 hours
Duration of the ultrasound performed by the general practitioner in minutes.
72 hours
The interpretability of ultrasound images by general practitioners
Time Frame: 72 hours

The interpretability of ultrasound images by general practitioners. For each patient, the general practitioner must note the result of his or her ultrasound (compressibility or total incompressibility of the veins on the 3 points studied). He must also correctly interpret the ultrasound result (presence of venous thrombosis in case of total incompressibility of the vein or absence of thrombosis in case of total compressibility of the vein).

The measure will be the percentage of correct interpretation of the compression test.
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Caen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas DELOMAS, Dr, Hospital Saint Lo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 22-0114
  • 22.02437.000091 (Other Identifier: CPP OUEST II)
  • 2022-A01244-39 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings