Minnesota HealthSolutions Cellular Car Seat Study
Sensor Network With Active Instructional Content to Prevent Child Safety Seat Misuse
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or Females ages 18-75 years
- Has harnessed/fastened a child into a car seat in the last five (5) years
- Has a valid driver's license
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-fluency in written and/or spoken English
- Participant cannot install a safety seat due to a physical or health limitation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Participants will harness the car seat in 3 separate scenarios with the sensor system enabled to provide feedback.
|
Participants will be exposed to each of the 3 scenarios with the sensor system enabled (with feedback)
|
|
Other: Control
Participants will harness the car seat in 3 separate scenarios with the sensor system disabled in order to not provide feedback.
|
The participants will be exposed to each of the 3 scenarios with the system disabled (no feedback).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants with installation errors
Time Frame: once during the only study visit: up to 30 mins
|
For each misuse scenario participants will be asked to correct the error in the seat installation or the harness tension.
Convertible seats will be used for this phase.
For each scenario, we will use a huggable images test doll (age and weight of the doll will be indicated to participants).
Study team will record seat direction (forward vs rear facing), harness tension (newtons), insecure attachment of the seat to the vehicle (yes/no).
|
once during the only study visit: up to 30 mins
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sara Seifert, MPH, Minnesota HealthSolutions
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ten leading causes of unintentional injury deaths, United States, 2016, all races, both sexes. https://webappa.cdc.gov/cgi-bin/broker.exe. Published 2016.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fatal Injury Data. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal.html. Accessed January 5, 2019.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2008 Data: Young Drivers. Vol 2010. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; 2008. doi:DOT HS 811 169
- National SAFE KIDS Campaign and NHTSA Child Passenger Safety Technician Program Participant Manual. :C-4.
- Li HR, Pickrell TM, KC S. The 2015 National Survey of the Use of Booster Seats. Washington, DC; 2016. www.ntis.gov.
- Greenwell NK. Results of the National Child Restraint Use Special Study. Washington, DC; 2015. www.ntis.gov.
- Durbin DR, Elliott MR, Winston FK. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes. JAMA. 2003 Jun 4;289(21):2835-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2835.
- Brown J, Bilston L, McCaskill M. Injury implications of inappropriate use of adult seatbelt systems for children aged 2-8. Australas Road Res Polic Educ Conf. 2003;7(2):81-87.
- Brown J, McCaskill ME, Henderson M, Bilston LE. Serious injury is associated with suboptimal restraint use in child motor vehicle occupants. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006 Jun;42(6):345-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00870.x.
- Lutz N, Arbogast KB, Cornejo RA, Winston FK, Durbin DR, Nance ML. Suboptimal restraint affects the pattern of abdominal injuries in children involved in motor vehicle crashes. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Jun;38(6):919-23. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00124-6.
- Valent F, McGwin G Jr, Hardin W, Johnston C, Rue LW 3rd. Restraint use and injury patterns among children involved in motor vehicle collisions. J Trauma. 2002 Apr;52(4):745-51. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200204000-00023.
- Weinstein EB, Sweeney MM, Garber M, Eastwood MD, Osterman JG, Roberts JV. The Effect of Size Appropriate and Proper Restraint Use on Injury Severity of Children. In: 2nd Child Occupant Protection Symposium. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE); 1997:181-186.
- Winston FK, Durbin DR, Kallan MJ, Moll EK. The danger of premature graduation to seat belts for young children. Pediatrics. 2000 Jun;105(6):1179-83. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.1179.
- Decina LE, Lococo KH. Misuse of child restraints. 2004. http://icsw.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/research/misuse/images/misusescreen.pdf.
- Klinich KD, Manary MA, Flannagan CAC, et al. Labels, Instructions, and Features of Convertible Child Restraint Systems (CRS): Evaluating Their Effects on CRS Installation Errors. Washington, DC; 2010.
- Wegner MV, Girasek DC. How readable are child safety seat installation instructions? Pediatrics. 2003 Mar;111(3):588-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.3.588.
- Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co.; 1996.
- Participants Central. Prevent child heatsroke in cars. http://www.safercar.gov/participants/InandAroundtheCar/heatstroke.htm. Accessed December 7, 2016.
- Singh S, Stern S, Subramanian R. Not-in-Traffic Surveillance: Non-Crash Fatalities and Injuries.; 2015.
- Rudd R, Prasad A, Weston D, Wietholter K. Functional Assessment of Unattended Child Reminder Systems. Washington, DC; 2015.
- Null J. Heatsroke deaths of children in vehicles. https://noheatstroke.org/index.htm. Accessed January 5, 2019.
- Arbogast KB, Durbin DR, Cornejo RA, Kallan MJ, Winston FK. An evaluation of the effectiveness of forward facing child restraint systems. Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Jul;36(4):585-9. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00065-4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20-017790
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.