Ai Youmian (Love Better Sleep) for People Living With HIV
Developing and Validating a Sleep Promotion Intervention Program for People Living With HIV Based on Social Rhythm Theory
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Hunan
-
Changsha, Hunan, China, 410000
- The First Hospital of Changsha
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed HIV infection,
- Aged 18 years or above,
- Total score of Pittsburgh sleep quality index > 7,
- Possess basic literacy,
- Voluntary participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Self reported previous diagnoses of severe sleep disorder disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, periodic limb movement of sleep, nocturnal urinary frequency or diurnal phase shift disorder,
- Initiation of antiretroviral therapy within the past 30 days or change in antiretroviral therapy regimen within the past 30 days,
- Current treatment with psychotropic medication, or use of any medication with sedative or excitatory effects,
- Working in jobs that require night shifts that may affect the circadian rhythm and no consideration of changing jobs in the recent month,
- Currently participating in other research projects.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Interpersonal and social rhythm intervention
|
The development of the intervention strategies are based on social rhythm theory, interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, and previous research results, and the intervention aims to improve sleep by stabilizing participants' social rhythm and increasing the amount of interpersonal communication.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Controlled group
|
Control group participants received usual care, including daily disease management and routine drug guidance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
change of sleep quality
Time Frame: Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) was used.
The scale consists of 18 items divided into 7 dimensions.
Each dimension is scored from 0 to 3. The total PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.
|
Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
change of social rhythm
Time Frame: Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
The Brief Social Rhythm Scale was used.
The scale consists of 10 items to assess the regularity of daily activities during the week.
The regularity of each activity is rated on a 6-point Likert type scale.
The total BSRS score ranges from 10 to 60, with higher total scores reflecting greater irregularity of the daily activities.
|
Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
|
change of sleepiness
Time Frame: Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale was used.
It contains 8 questions, each scoring 0-3 with increasing number signifying higher chance of "dozing" while engaged in specific activities of daily life.
|
Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
|
change of sleep beliefs and attitudes
Time Frame: Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep was used.
The scale consists of 16 items.
The scoring range for each item was from 1 to 5 and the sum of scores of all 16 items ranged from 16 to 80.
The lower total score indicates the more erroneous beliefs a participant has.
|
Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
|
change of coping styles
Time Frame: Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire was used.
The 20-item scale includes 2 dimensions, positive coping (12 items) and negative coping (8 items).
Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater positive/negative coping styles.
The mean scores for the positive and negative items were the final scores for positive and negative coping, respectively.
|
Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
|
change of social support
Time Frame: Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
Perceived Social Support Scale was used.
The 12-item scale uses a 7-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 12 to 84, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived social support.
|
Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
|
change of depression symptoms
Time Frame: Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
The self-rating depression scale was used.
The scale included 20 items and each item was scored on a 4-point Likert scale to examine the frequency of the occurrence of assessed depression symptoms over the previous week.
The total raw score ranged from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression symptoms.
|
Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
|
change of interpersonal competence
Time Frame: Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire was used.
The scale included 40 items and each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale.
The total score ranged from 40 to 200, with higher scores indicating higher levels of interpersonal competence.
|
Outcomes was evaluated before the intervention (T0), after the 8-week intervention (T1), and 3 months follow-up after the intervention (T2)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
sleep diary
Time Frame: Participants in the intervention group were required to record a sleep diary after getting up on a daily basis during the 8-week intervention, which was used to guide adjustment of the weekly intervention strategy.
|
Bedtime, sleep latency, times of waking up during the night, self-rated sleep quality, time of getting up in the morning, etc
|
Participants in the intervention group were required to record a sleep diary after getting up on a daily basis during the 8-week intervention, which was used to guide adjustment of the weekly intervention strategy.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jingjing MENG, Central South University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wu J, Wu H, Lu C, Guo L, Li P. Self-reported sleep disturbances in HIV-infected people: a meta-analysis of prevalence and moderators. Sleep Med. 2015 Aug;16(8):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.03.027. Epub 2015 May 18.
- Ning CX, Chen XX, Lin HJ, Qiao XT, Xu YY, Shen WW, Zhao D, He N, Ding YY. [Characteristics of sleep disorder in HIV positive and HIV negative individuals: a cluster analysis]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019 May 10;40(5):499-504. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.05.002. Chinese.
- Lee KA, Gay C, Portillo CJ, Coggins T, Davis H, Pullinger CR, Aouizerat BE. Types of sleep problems in adults living with HIV/AIDS. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Feb 15;8(1):67-75. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1666.
- Pujasari H, Chung MH. Sleep Disturbance in the Context of HIV: A Concept Analysis. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Apr 20;8:23779608221094541. doi: 10.1177/23779608221094541. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
- Voss JG, Barroso J, Wang T. A Critical Review of Symptom Management Nursing Science on HIV-Related Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010685.
- Grandin LD, Alloy LB, Abramson LY. The social zeitgeber theory, circadian rhythms, and mood disorders: review and evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;26(6):679-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
- Monk TH, Reynolds CF 3rd, Buysse DJ, DeGrazia JM, Kupfer DJ. The relationship between lifestyle regularity and subjective sleep quality. Chronobiol Int. 2003 Jan;20(1):97-107. doi: 10.1081/cbi-120017812.
- Haynes PL, Kelly M, Warner L, Quan SF, Krakow B, Bootzin RR. Cognitive Behavioral Social Rhythm Group Therapy for Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and sleep disturbance: Results from an open trial. J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 1;192:234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021zzts0334
- CX20210113 (OTHER_GRANT: The Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.